Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or to use animal products, for example, clothing and medicines. Discuss both views and give your opinion

In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or to use animal products, for example, clothing and medicines. Discuss both views and give your opinion 5aKoP

There is often much debate around the fact that more and more people, especially scientists, use animals as instruments catering to humans' needs. Although it can be stated that creatures play a crucial role in life, I would argue that this action should be stopped because of their cruelty. One the one hand, we can not deny that products made from animals are extremely necessary for people owing to their contribution to medical methods and the development of the economy. Under certain assumptions, this can be construed as animals, mostly mammal species such as: lions, mammoths and so on have biological characteristics similar to humans. It is rather clear to some extent this may result in its reliability and charisma and also accuration of animal experience, it cured manifold chronic diseases like cancer or rabies vaccine, which received a large number of certifications from doctors. On the other hand, it is generally believed that using animals is unnecessary. The subsequent factor could be because of this action is lack of humanity. This means that creatures also have the right to live, nobody is allowed to take the life of anyone including animals. At the same time, the main basis is probably owing to the fact that we are living in the 4. 0 eras with modern technology. There is a significant rise in the number of new treatments that replaced animals in the past. This results in the case that we may protect the ecological systems and maintain biodiversity. Having considered both views, I think individuals need to treat animals well, trying to explore manifold ways to advance the medical system.

There is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
 much debate around the fact that more and more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
, especially
 scientists, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 as instruments catering to humans' needs. Although it can be stated
 that creatures play a crucial role in life, I would argue that this action should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceaseddiscontinued
stopped
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of their cruelty.

Did you mean "on"?On
One
 the one hand, we can not deny that products made from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are extremely
 necessary for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 owing to their contribution to medical methods and the development of the economy. Under certain assumptions, this can be construed
 as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, mostly
 mammal species such as: lions, mammoths and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 on have biological characteristics similar to humans. It is rather
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 extent this may result in its reliability and charisma and also
Possible spelling mistake found.accusation
accuration
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 experience, it cured manifold chronic diseases like cancer or rabies vaccine, which received Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"manynumerous
a large number of
 certifications from doctors.

On the other hand
, it is generally
 believed that using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is unnecessary. The subsequent factor could be because of this
 action is lack of humanity. This means that creatures also
 have the right to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
, nobody is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:admissible
allowed
 to take the life of anyone including You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. At the same time, the main basis is probably
 owing to the fact that we are living in the 4. 0 eras with modern technology. There is a significant rise in the number of new treatments that replaced You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in the past. This results in the case that we may protect the ecological systems and maintain biodiversity.

Having considered both views, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 individuals need to treat You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 well, trying to explore manifold ways to advance the medical system. 