Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In the future ,it seems it would be more difficult to live on earth . Some people think more money should be spent researching on other planet to live such as mars .to what extent do you agree or disagree.

Global pollution is significantly upsurged nowadays which has become an alarming situation amongst the society. For leading a quality life earth is no more suitable for human beings. Should government spend money for searching outer planet? In my perspective, it is absolutely wrong because in the case of healthy and pollution free life style this is not a solution. Predominantly, searching another planet for human life is totally wastage of money because still there is no evidence of such kind of planet, where life can be possible; while, NASA has spent exorbitant amount of money to discover such planet. Instead of searching another planet, money ought to be utiliged to make eco-friendly substitution of pollutant resources. Consequently, it would be a stride forward to dealt with environmental problems. Apart from this, there are verious cretaries, where need of the hour is demanding improvement in the term of leading a quality life: free basic education- underpreviliged poppulation-free medical treatment-homelessness. Despite of measurments of such problems, dwellers can enjoy prosperity, which is birth right of everyone. Resultantly, expenditure would be worthful if government seeking out solution to these obstacles. To conclude, I reiterate that due to pollution life is in dangeour zone thus, authorties should spend wealth to invent or discover environment friendly alternatives of pollutant resources rather then searching another home in space.
Global pollution is
significantly
upsurged nowadays which has become an alarming situation amongst the society. For leading a quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
earth is no more suitable for human beings. Should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
spend
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
searching
outer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
planet
? In my perspective, it is
absolutely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
in the case of healthy and pollution free
This noun is normally spelled as one word.
life style
this is not a solution.

Predominantly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
searching
another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
planet
for human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
is
totally
wastage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
still
there is no evidence of such kind of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
planet
, where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
can be possible; while, NASA has spent exorbitant amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
to discover such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
planet
.
Instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
searching
another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
planet
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
ought to be
Possible spelling mistake found.
utiliged
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
eco-friendly substitution of pollutant resources.
Consequently
, it would be a stride forward to dealt with environmental problems.

Apart from this, there are
Possible spelling mistake found.
verious
Possible spelling mistake found.
cretaries
, where need of the hour is demanding improvement in the term of leading a quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
: free basic education-
Possible spelling mistake found.
underpreviliged
Possible spelling mistake found.
poppulation-free
medical treatment-homelessness.
Did you mean “Despite” (or, alternatively, ‘in spite of’)?
Despite of
Possible spelling mistake found.
measurments
of such problems, dwellers can enjoy prosperity, which is birth right of everyone.
Resultantly
, expenditure would be
Possible spelling mistake found.
worthful
if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
seeking out solution to these obstacles.

To conclude
, I reiterate that due to pollution
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
is in
Possible spelling mistake found.
dangeour
zone
thus
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
authorties
should spend wealth to invent or discover environment friendly alternatives of pollutant resources
rather
Did you mean “than”? ‘than’ is used for comparisons, ‘then’ is an expression of time.
then
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
searching
another home in space.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In the future, it seems it would be more difficult to live on earth. Some people think more money should be spent researching on other planet to live such as mars.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
222 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In the future ,it seems it would be more difficult to live on earth . Some people think more money should be spent researching on other planet to live such as mars .to what extent do you agree or disagree.