Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

The most compelling evidence from the history of the world, the breeds were under manipulated by human demand, and being frequently undermined the right of them. A number of individual reckoned the moral creature survival right it is driven from brutal killing of personal interests. In reality, the environment supply is one of the major requirement for mortal to reside in the world. In the mean time, human species retain the survive skills on the earth, the protection of ecosystem should be discipllined under regularing the balance of the world. Surprising enough, the supporters not only limited around the religions nation, but also the vegetarians who would try to shatter the life being concern through the various tactics. On the contrary, the opposition would not catch those moral supporter’s opinions. The defenders for the right of the species out of human seldom choose it is the main purpose for the society abolishing human habits. For the reason keep the habits on controlling other species has been contributing the whole system of people to process the life of animals. Not only above that, the acquirement of animal resources is well-establish during the neglecting the survival right. For this disagreement, animal life is not the main principle for the progression of human society, even one day the possibility of being genocide by the overuse by the will of human. As a matter of fact, the consideration of both side would keep continuing change through the time. There is no one true answer in any history. The only tactic for solve the argument of the right for other species would different stunning skills from the will of people. Once the progression of the modern society focus eon the life quality of themselves, the similar moral questions would grow from everywhere. The living space on the earth is limited, and human would not interfere the single specie needs, that is, human species. Although vegetarian and religions might be the main population for concerning the right of animals. There has evidence to believe that over breed animal could harm the whole ecosystem on the earth. Due to those reasons, the fight of the right for animals would being digger out in a violence discussions.
The most compelling evidence from the history of the world, the breeds were under manipulated by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
demand, and being
frequently
undermined the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
of them.
Possible agreement error. The noun individual seems to be countable; consider using: “a number of individuals”.
A number of individual
reckoned the moral creature survival
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
it
is driven
from brutal killing of personal interests. In reality, the environment supply is one of the major requirement for mortal to reside in the world.
The correct spelling for this commonly used idiom is “In the meantime”.
In the mean time
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
species retain
After ‘the’, do not use a verb. Make sure that the spelling of ‘survive’ is correct. If ‘survive’ is the first word in a compound adjective, use a hyphen between the two words. Note: This error message can occur if you use a verb as a noun, and the word is not a noun in standard English.
the survive
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
on the earth, the protection of ecosystem should be
Possible spelling mistake found.
discipllined
under
Possible spelling mistake found.
regularing
the balance of the world. Surprising
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
, the supporters not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
limited around the
An apostrophe may be missing.
religions
nation,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
the vegetarians who would try to shatter the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
being concern through the various tactics.

On the contrary
, the opposition would not catch those moral supporter’s opinions. The defenders for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
of the species out of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
seldom choose it is the main purpose for the society abolishing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
habits. For the reason
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
the habits on controlling other species has been contributing the whole system of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to process the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. Not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
above that, the acquirement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
resources is well-establish during the neglecting the survival
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
. For this disagreement,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
is not the main principle for the progression of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
society, even one day the possibility of being genocide by the overuse by the will of human.

As a matter of fact, the consideration of both side would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
continuing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
through the time. There is no one true answer in any history. The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
tactic for solve the argument of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
for other species would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
stunning
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
from the will of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. Once the progression of the modern society focus eon the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
quality of themselves, the similar moral questions would grow from everywhere. The living space on the earth
is limited
, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
would not interfere the single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
specie
needs,
that is
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
species. Although vegetarian and religions might be the main population for concerning the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. There has evidence to believe that over breed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
could harm the whole ecosystem on the earth. Due to those reasons, the fight of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
would being digger out in
The plural noun “discussions” cannot be used with the article “a”.
a violence discussions
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
369 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.