In the contemporary world, we live in countless intensive competitions. Therefore, the leader plays a pivotal and critical role in all aspects of life, and benchmarks of selecting expertise and the potential person always prioritize of the group. Some people claim that the leader position should be replaced by adolescents. Though both sides are backed that at a certain age range, it is understandable and plausible, i more supportive for young leaders.
Advocates with this point of view claim that, in general, youngsters always have a delicate and sensitive look about this complicated environment. Therefore, they are easy to adapt and innovate, which is the priority factor in the fast-paced changing context of the economy. Moreover, young individual tend to have physical stronger, so they can handle big responsibilities as much as they can. Being a leader need to cope with a numerous strain and pressure, and old people are often capable to doing this.
For example. , a young manager can come up with a new advertising strategy for a product, which contributes to the increasing sales of the company.
On the other hand, the replacement of old generations can exert a sooner-or-later issues. In all aspects of life, the overwhelming of labour force always the alarming matter in the whole world, so that experienced person are always esteemed. In other words, if organizations maintain a conservative criterion of giving priority to senior leaders, the upcoming aging population would leave a great economic hole.
In brief, we can not find the person who adapt with all factors, but we can not neglect the potential character of both young and old person. But in the transformation world, i am convinced that young generation will attributes their capacity will adaptable
In the contemporary world, we
live
in countless intensive competitions.
Therefore
, the
leader
plays a pivotal and critical role in all aspects of life, and benchmarks of selecting expertise and the potential
person
always prioritize of the group.
Some
people
claim that the
leader
position should
be replaced
by adolescents. Though both sides
are backed
that at a certain age range, it is understandable and plausible, i more supportive for
young
leaders.
Advocates with this point of view claim that,
in general
, youngsters always have a delicate and sensitive look about this complicated environment.
Therefore
, they are easy to adapt and innovate, which is the priority factor in the
fast
-paced changing context of the economy.
Moreover
,
young
individual tend to have physical stronger,
so
they can handle
big
responsibilities as much as they can. Being a
leader
need to cope with a numerous strain and pressure, and
old
people
are
often
capable to doing this.
For example
.
,
a
young
manager can
come
up with a new advertising strategy for a product, which contributes to the increasing sales of the
company
.
On the other hand
, the replacement of
old
generations can exert a sooner-or-later issues. In all aspects of life, the overwhelming of
labour
force always
the alarming matter in the whole world,
so
that experienced
person
are always esteemed.
In other words
, if organizations maintain a conservative criterion of giving priority to senior
leaders
, the upcoming aging population would
leave
a great economic hole.
In
brief, we can not find the
person
who adapt with all factors,
but
we can not neglect the potential character of both
young
and
old
person
.
But
in the transformation world,
i
am convinced
that
young
generation will
attributes
their capacity will
adaptable