As age plays an increasingly more central part of our lives, it has been suggested that there has been more value to the people based on age. It is often argued that elderly people are more important than millennial. However, in my opinion young people should be given more importance, and this essay will analyze both the sides of the spectrum and draw the conclusion.
Even though youngsters has the main role to play in coming future, it would be foolish to not to recognize the importance of past generation people who taught us the basic of culture and share their impeccable knowledge. In most of the countries age plays a significant factor to be considered for leadership qualities, as matured people have more experience than youth. This has been exemplified in inclining number of people who have been designated as higher authorities in many corporate sectors. One reason behind this happening is, they have more hands-on experience on the industry when compared to present generation. Anyway this is one side of the coin.
On the other hand, it is an irrefutable fact that the future of the world is in the hands of iGeneration. As we can see, that the numbers are overwhelming in certain demographic regions they are often called as countries driven by youth. These are considered as the asset of the culture, as they carry the sentiments and knowledge to the next generations. When it comes to decision-making in many areas juveniles can think more maturely than graying generation. This can be seen in many military operations, that numbers of commanders are under 30-35 years, this is because, at this age they can take instant decisions which can mitigate the risk. These are the ultra prominent reasons that are put forward younger than old people.
Despite there are many speculations around the age factor for the consideration of valuable resources. I opine that youngsters should be considered more valued; because, today’s youth are tomorrow’s leaders.
As
age
plays an
increasingly
more central part of our
lives
, it has
been suggested
that there has been more value to the
people
based on
age
. It is
often
argued that elderly
people
are more
important
than millennial.
However
, in my opinion young
people
should be
given
more importance, and this essay will analyze both the sides of the spectrum and draw the conclusion.
Even though
youngsters has the main role to play in coming future, it would be foolish
to not to
recognize the importance of past generation
people
who taught us the basic of culture and share their impeccable knowledge. In most of the countries
age
plays a significant factor to
be considered
for leadership qualities, as matured
people
have more experience than youth. This has
been exemplified
in inclining number of
people
who have
been designated
as higher authorities in
many
corporate sectors. One reason behind this happening is, they have more hands-on experience on the industry when compared to present generation. Anyway this is one side of the coin.
On the other hand
, it is an irrefutable fact that the future of the world is in the hands of
iGeneration
. As we can
see
, that the numbers are overwhelming in certain demographic regions they are
often
called as countries driven by youth. These
are considered
as the asset of the culture, as they carry the sentiments and knowledge to the
next
generations.
When
it
comes
to decision-making in
many
areas juveniles can
think
more
maturely
than graying generation. This can be
seen
in
many
military operations, that numbers of commanders are under 30-35 years, this is
because
, at this
age
they can take instant decisions which can mitigate the
risk
. These are the ultra prominent reasons that
are put
forward younger than
old
people
.
Despite there are
many
speculations around the
age
factor for the consideration of valuable resources. I opine that youngsters should
be considered
more valued;
because
,
today
’s youth are tomorrow’s leaders.