While many people state that an ideal class would be contained mixed-ability student, the rest claims to group children according to ability, which means brilliant children would study in the independent and proper environment. While I acknowledge that both methods have difference advantages, I prefer a mixed class.
On the one hand, relevant to mixed-ability model, the equality or justice are likely to be perceived by a majority of learners in terms of ethtics. Moreover, the class with a diversity of student's levels makes an incredible win - win situation as the distinctive student could have more motivation to achieve their target while the others are expected to get more efforts to be better. In addition, with mixed classes, advanced students can experience the satisfaction of helping less-able learners and modeling more complex ideas. This practice may build confidence in the advanced students and help them foster the relationship bond.
On the other hand, concerned with streaming method, some schools separate students according to their academic ability in order to cater those students with an appropriate curriculum. In detail, high-level groups may absorb faster while lower-level groups could only benefit from a slower pace. Additionally, by this method, teacher could design more challenging lessons to enhance knowledge of bright students. Nevertheless, a negative impact of streaming on students are inevitable. It is clear that no one wants to be considered as a less intelligent than others so that grouping children could damage students' self-esteem.
In conclusion, the influence of education on human's live are critical and profound. As individual demands are varied so that learners should be careful when choosing studying environment. In my opinion, mixed class is highly praised and the distinctive students could take part in extra classes to make the enhancement facilitate their abilities better.
While
many
people
state that an ideal
class
would
be contained
mixed-ability
student
, the rest claims to group children according to ability, which means brilliant children would study in the independent and proper environment. While I acknowledge that both methods have difference advantages, I prefer a mixed
class
.
On the one hand, relevant to mixed-ability model, the equality or justice are likely to
be perceived
by a majority of learners in terms of
ethtics
.
Moreover
, the
class
with a diversity of student's levels
makes
an incredible win
-
win situation as the distinctive
student
could have more motivation to achieve their target while the others are
expected
to
get
more efforts to be better.
In addition
, with mixed
classes
, advanced
students
can experience the satisfaction of helping less-able learners and modeling more complex
ideas
. This practice may build confidence in the advanced
students
and
help
them foster the relationship bond.
On the other hand
, concerned with streaming method,
some
schools separate
students
according to their academic ability in order to cater those
students
with an appropriate curriculum. In detail, high-level groups may absorb faster while lower-level groups could
only
benefit from a slower pace.
Additionally
, by this method, teacher could design more challenging lessons to enhance knowledge of bright
students
.
Nevertheless
, a
negative
impact of streaming on
students
are inevitable. It is
clear
that no one wants to
be considered
as a less intelligent than others
so
that grouping children could damage students' self-esteem.
In conclusion
, the influence of education on human's
live
are critical and profound. As individual demands
are varied
so
that learners should be careful when choosing
studying
environment. In my opinion, mixed
class
is
highly
praised and the distinctive
students
could
take part
in extra
classes
to
make
the enhancement facilitate their abilities better.