It is sometimes stated that possessing accommodation is more predominant as opposed to hiring one. There are numerous circumstances which can lead to this consequence, and from my perspective, this is a virtuous occurrence.
On the one hand, of various consequences of owning a house, one is that individual can gain a sense of stability. This is because unlike hiring accommodation, possessing one may not require to leave the house when people get in financially trouble. If they rented a home, they would move to another one due to financial constraints. Evidently, in order to deterring any precarious situations by residing in a permanent house, people would prefer to live by the way of acquiring personal accommodation.
On the other hand, people are residing their personal house can be given self-independence in reconstructing their house which would be positive circumstance. This is mainly because individual can have a good opportunity to decorate or make their house to look good, whereas this process can be virtually impossible for people who are resident of temporary house. To illustrate this, in Bangladesh, people will not be able to alter a house`s construction which is not belonging to them, unless they own this accommodation, due to the law of personal property. As a result, people can be more independent, in turn, they are able to construct buildings, as well as, decorate them.
To sum up, possessing a living establishment can be more crucial in comparison with hiring one, and this is caused by sense of stability, whereas this phenomena would lead to positive circumstance, in turn, evoking self-independence.
It is
sometimes
stated that possessing accommodation is more predominant as opposed to hiring one. There are numerous circumstances which can lead to this consequence, and from my perspective, this is a virtuous occurrence.
On the one hand, of various consequences of owning a
house
, one is that individual can gain a sense of stability. This is
because
unlike hiring accommodation, possessing one may not require to
leave
the
house
when
people
get
in
financially
trouble. If they rented a home, they would
move
to another one due to financial constraints.
Evidently
, in order to
deterring
any precarious situations by residing in a permanent
house
,
people
would prefer to
live
by the way of acquiring personal accommodation.
On the other hand
,
people
are residing their personal
house
can be
given
self-independence in reconstructing their
house
which would be
positive
circumstance. This is
mainly
because
individual can have a
good
opportunity to decorate or
make
their
house
to look
good
, whereas this process can be
virtually
impossible for
people
who are resident of temporary
house
. To illustrate this, in Bangladesh,
people
will not be able to alter a
house`s
construction which
is not belonging
to them, unless they
own
this accommodation, due to the law of personal property.
As a result
,
people
can be more independent, in turn, they are able to construct buildings,
as well
as, decorate them.
To sum up, possessing a living establishment can be more crucial
in comparison
with hiring one, and this
is caused
by sense of stability, whereas
this
phenomena would lead to
positive
circumstance, in turn, evoking self-independence.