It is considered by some people that raising the price by the government for fuel used for transportation resolves a worldwide problem called pollution. In my opinion, it may help to some extent, however, different solutions and strategies should be used to tackle this problem in a professional and effective method.
Increasing the cost of gasoline reduces the number of cars on the road will automatically lead to less congestion and less environmental problems. In other words, it is commonly known that the increasing number of cars is one of the major causes of air pollution, and by paying more money for petrol, people are encouraged to either use public transportation or commute in groups. For example, different companies in Lebanon that are environmental friendly send buses to different meeting points, where co-workers use the bus to arrive work.
On the other hand, governments should implement other means in parallel for an effective result concerning air contamination. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar should be used by factories to decrease the usage of non-renewable energy namely fuel and petrol causing industrial air pollution. For instance, a recent research showed that government who enforces the usage of wind and water as sources of energy in factories have 30% less diseases and environmental problems than governments leaving their production companies use fuel.
In conclusion, I believe that increasing the petrol cost is one step forward for a better environment, nevertheless it is not an absolute and effective solution with no parallel strategies are getting applied by factories.
It
is considered
by
some
people
that raising the price by the
government
for fuel
used
for transportation resolves a worldwide
problem
called pollution. In my opinion, it may
help
to
some
extent,
however
,
different
solutions and strategies should be
used
to tackle this
problem
in a professional and effective method.
Increasing the cost of gasoline
reduces
the number of cars on the road will
automatically
lead to less congestion and less environmental
problems
.
In other words
, it is
commonly
known that the increasing number of cars is one of the major causes of air pollution, and by paying more money for petrol,
people
are encouraged
to either
use
public transportation or commute in groups.
For example
,
different
companies
in Lebanon that are environmental friendly
send
buses to
different
meeting points, where co-workers
use
the bus to arrive work.
On the other hand
,
governments
should implement other means in parallel for an effective result concerning air contamination. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar should be
used
by factories to decrease the usage of non-renewable energy
namely
fuel and petrol causing industrial air pollution.
For instance
, a recent research
showed
that
government
who enforces the usage of wind and water as sources of energy in factories have 30% less diseases and environmental
problems
than
governments
leaving their production
companies
use
fuel.
In conclusion
, I believe that increasing the petrol cost is one step forward for a better environment,
nevertheless
it is not an absolute and effective solution with no parallel strategies are getting applied by factories.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes