Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is undeniable that in numerous countries, earnings of some people are incredibly high compared to the rest of the people. It is believed by some people that nation can take advantage of this phenomenon. The opposite side believe such gap between earnings of people should be taken into control, even set limitations in high salary. In my opinion, from high salary earners whole country can reap the benefits and we shouldn't discourage them by limiting their salaries. Some people think taking control over salaries should be implemented due to gap between the elite and the ordinary. Take India as an example, little proportion of population gets a huge amount of money, whereas most people even don't have basic opportunities to eat enough food. Having set limitations, governments can decrease discrimination among their citizens. Every single citizen would earn the same amount of money despite their performance. It might show several advantages, including balancing the life standard of people; however, it might have side-effect as well. For example, having done these implementations, former SSSR failed to survive as a government. To some extent, government can benefit from the people who make tremendous money. The higher salary people get, the more taxes they pay for the government. This income can be directed at essential fields like hospitals and schools. Furthermore, these people are highly likely to set up their own business, which will definitely create work places for population. This can decrease unemployment rateand increase living standards in this country. In conclusion, although some consider certain people's high income is unbearable, it is much more advantageous for their nationwide structure in terms of creating new work places and the high taxation payment to government's account.
It is undeniable that in numerous countries, earnings of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are
incredibly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high
compared to the rest of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. It
is believed
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
that nation can take advantage of this phenomenon. The opposite side believe such gap between earnings of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
should
be taken
into control, even set limitations in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
salary
. In my opinion, from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
salary
earners whole country can reap the
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
benefits and
we shouldn't discourage them by limiting their salaries.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
taking control over
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
salaries
should
be implemented
due to gap between the elite and the ordinary. Take India as an example,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
proportion of population
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
gets
a huge amount of money, whereas most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
even don't have basic opportunities to eat
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
food. Having set limitations,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
can decrease discrimination among their citizens. Every single citizen would earn the same amount of money despite their performance. It might
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
several advantages, including balancing the life standard of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
;
however
, it might have
Did you mean “side effect” (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
side-effect
as well
.
For example
, having done these implementations, former
Possible spelling mistake found.
SSSR
failed to survive as a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
.

To
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
can benefit from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
tremendous money. The higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
salary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
, the more taxes they pay for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
. This income can
be directed
at essential fields like hospitals and schools.
Furthermore
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are
highly
likely to set up their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
business, which will definitely create work places for population. This can decrease unemployment
Possible spelling mistake found.
rateand
increase living standards in this country.

In conclusion
, although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
consider certain
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high
income is unbearable, it is much more advantageous for their nationwide structure in terms of creating new work places and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high
taxation payment to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
's account.

IELTS essay In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
284 words
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.