Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some cities, the governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative? v.1

In some cities, the governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative? v. 1
Many people drive their own car to work, making traffic congestion during rush hour. Governments have imposed an extra tax on the drivers, trying to reduce traffic. However, I consider it a negative development. First, imposing an extra tax during rush hour cannot reduce people’s willingness to drive to work. Although paying extra money increases the burden of workers, the advantages of driving to work still outweigh that drawback. Commuting by their own car is convenient and comfortable for workers. They can alternate their schedules freely, instead of following the timetables of trains or buses. In addition, they can enjoy their own space before work. Therefore, authorities should optimise public transportation systems and launch promotion projects to attract workers. For instance, authorities can expand the subway systems as well as increase the train frequency. Otherwise, workers will not change their habit. Furthermore, levying a congestion tax worsens the traffic. Authorities have to check the identification of every driver during the rush hour, in order to impose a tax. Drivers are forced to stop and receive examination. It is a complex work, and it takes much time for the police to make sure whether or not the information is correct. Roads would be more congested by the measure. Authorities can uplift the fare of parking and reduce the parking lots in cities. It will be more efficient for making people less willing to drive during rush hour. In conclusion, imposing a congestion tax is neither effective nor efficient for reducing traffic during rush hour. I suggest that governments should try other measures to deal with the problem.
Many
people
drive their
own
car to
work
, making
traffic
congestion during
rush
hour
.
Governments
have imposed an extra
tax
on the drivers, trying to
reduce
traffic
.
However
, I consider it a
negative
development.

First
, imposing an extra
tax
during
rush
hour
cannot
reduce
people
’s willingness to drive to
work
. Although paying extra money increases the burden of
workers
, the advantages of driving to
work
still
outweigh that drawback. Commuting by their
own
car is convenient and comfortable for
workers
. They can alternate their schedules
freely
,
instead
of following the timetables of trains or buses.
In addition
, they can enjoy their
own
space
before
work
.
Therefore
,
authorities
should
optimise
public transportation systems and launch promotion projects to attract
workers
.
For instance
,
authorities
can expand the subway systems
as well
as increase the train frequency.
Otherwise
,
workers
will not
change
their habit.

Furthermore
, levying a congestion
tax
worsens the
traffic
.
Authorities
have to
check
the identification of every driver during the
rush
hour
, in order to impose a
tax
. Drivers
are forced
to
stop
and receive examination. It is a complex
work
, and it takes much time for the police to
make
sure
whether or not
the information is correct. Roads would be more congested by the measure.
Authorities
can uplift the fare of parking and
reduce
the parking lots in cities. It will be more efficient for making
people
less willing to drive during
rush
hour.

In conclusion
, imposing a congestion
tax
is neither effective nor efficient for reducing
traffic
during
rush
hour
. I suggest that
governments
should try other measures to deal with the problem.
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
31Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes

IELTS essay In some cities, the governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative? v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
266 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts