Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In several years many languages die out. Some say it is not important because if we speak fewer languages life would be easier. Do you agree or disagree? v.2

In several years many languages die out. Some say it is not important because if we speak fewer languages life would be easier. v. 2
The United Nations estimates that approximately 6, 500 languages are spoken in the world today. By the end of this century, many linguists estimate that over half of those 6, 500 languages will be gone. Some opine that it is futile to save these languages because it is more convenient to have fewer languages today. I agree with this view. The reason why the possibility of a language dying raises so much concern for sociolinguists is that language is directly related to culture. It is said that, ―When a language dies, a culture dies‖. Secondly, these languages are a significant part of their speaker' s identity. Beyond preserving culture and using language as a part of the speakers' identity, a very practical reason for wanting to save a dying language is that archaeologists and anthropologists can get a wealth of information about a society from its language. If a language dies out, so does our access to direct knowledge about its customs, folk tales, and vocabulary for describing the world. However, languages that lose their communicative purposes and are abandoned by speakers should disappear from the public arena. The truth of ―when a language dies, a culture dies‖ does not imply the truth of when a language is saved, a culture is so saved. The change of culture is a normal part of the law of change and we should welcome this change. The only thing that can be achieved by saving a language is for intra-linguistic studies and nothing more. Furthermore, it is irrefutable that what actually kills languages is the choices of the speakers. The moment the speakers of a language realize that their language does not have a global functionality, they begin to abandon it. In today‘s global village, it is far more convenient to have a few languages. There is better communication and also better job prospects worldwide with fewer languages. Even the technology of today is more comfortable to learn with fewer languages. So, such languages that have limited potential at the global stage, and they thus come under threat or even die, it would be better to let them die. There is no need to preserve them. To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, the idea of saving threatened languages sounds good but it is difficult to sustain because the speakers have a right to shift to another language. Once this happens, there is no logical basis for saving a past linguistic behavior. What is more, globalization will continually lead to language shift. This trend is not likely to abate. Therefore, it is not important to save endangered languages.
The United Nations estimates that approximately 6, 500
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
are spoken
in the world
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
today
. By the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of this century,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
linguists estimate that over half of those 6, 500
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
will
be gone
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
opine that it is futile to save these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is more convenient to have fewer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
today
. I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this view.

The reason why the possibility of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
dying raises
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
much concern for
Possible spelling mistake found.
sociolinguists
is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
is
directly
related to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
culture
. It
is said
that,
Possible spelling mistake found.
―When
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dies
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
culture
Possible spelling mistake found.
dies‖
.
Secondly
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
are a significant part of their
Possible spelling mistake found.
speaker&
#039; s identity. Beyond preserving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
culture
and using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
as a part of the
Possible spelling mistake found.
speakers&
#039; identity, a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
practical reason for wanting to save a dying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
is that archaeologists and anthropologists can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a wealth of information about a society from its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
. If a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dies
out,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
does our access to direct knowledge about its customs, folk tales, and vocabulary for describing the world.

However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
that lose their communicative purposes and
are abandoned
by speakers should disappear from the public arena. The truth of
Possible spelling mistake found.
―when
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dies
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
culture
Possible spelling mistake found.
dies‖
does not imply the truth of when a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
is saved
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
culture
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
saved. The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
culture
is a normal part of the law of
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
change and
we should welcome this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
thing that can
be achieved
by saving a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
is for
Possible spelling mistake found.
intra-linguistic
studies and nothing more.

Furthermore
, it is irrefutable that what actually kills
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
is the choices of the speakers. The moment the speakers of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
realize that their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
does not have a global functionality, they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
to abandon it. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
today‘s
global village, it is far more convenient to have a few
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
. There is better communication and
also
better job prospects worldwide with fewer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
. Even the technology of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
today
is more comfortable to learn with fewer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
that have limited potential at the global stage, and they
thus
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
under threat or even
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
, it would be better to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
them
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
. There is no need to preserve them.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
of saving threatened
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
sounds
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it is difficult to sustain
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the speakers have a right to shift to another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
. Once this happens, there is no logical basis for saving a past linguistic behavior.
What is more
, globalization will
continually
lead to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
language
shift. This trend is not likely to abate.
Therefore
, it is not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to save endangered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
languages
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
42Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
10Mistakes

IELTS essay In several years many languages die out. Some say it is not important because if we speak fewer languages life would be easier. v. 2

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
439 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts