Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In recent times, due to the state-of-the-art technologies and the exponential growth witnessed in our world numerous people advocate that nuclear power might be paramount. Agree or disagree.

In recent times, due to the state-of-the-art technologies and the exponential growth witnessed in our world numerous people advocate that nuclear power might be paramount. Agree or disagree. 8Jlol
In recent times, due to the state-of-the-art technologies and the exponential growth witnessed in our world numerous people advocate that nuclear power might be paramount in order to preserve both a healthy environment and favorable relationships between countries. In this essay, I shall express why I agree with the debatable aspect of considering that nuclear power possesses more benefits than drawbacks. To begin with, in a plethora of metropolis the air we breathe is laden with hazardous chemicals and their rivers and waterways have been poisoned with contaminants. This phenomenon has been possible basically because of the overdependence of fossil fuels and its irrational consumption. Consequently, nuclear energy might be a milestone for these places with endangered welfare, biodiversity and vitality. To illustrate, a nuclear plant not only is able to generate extraordinarily more energy than other, but also it is well-known by scientists that the inherent pollution its barely existent. Therefore, by using nuclear energy it is highly likely to reduce diseases related to exhaust fumes such as asthma or even emphysema. Another pertinent point is that had it not been for nuclear weapons humanity would have been on the verge of war numerous times. Thus, the above-mentioned energy has played an extremely important role in modern diplomacy. For instance, the close-knit relationships between different countries took place from the moment in which nuclear weapons were discovered, mainly in order to promote preventive measures against a nuclear war. In conclusion, despite understanding that many people do believe that governments should legislate and amend the law in order to ban nuclear energy, I disagree. I deem that we should incorporate this energy into our biggest cities to supply the energy shortage without jeopardizing their atmosphere. And consequently, under no circumstances should we forbid this crucial source in our world.
In recent times, due to the state-of-the-art technologies and the exponential growth witnessed in our world numerous
people
advocate that nuclear power might be paramount in order to preserve both a healthy environment and favorable relationships between countries. In this essay, I shall express why I
agree
with the debatable aspect of considering that nuclear power possesses more benefits than drawbacks.

To
begin
with, in a plethora of metropolis the air we breathe is laden with hazardous chemicals and their rivers and waterways have
been poisoned
with contaminants. This phenomenon has been possible
basically
because
of the
overdependence
of fossil fuels and its irrational consumption.
Consequently
, nuclear
energy
might be a milestone for these places with endangered welfare, biodiversity and vitality. To illustrate, a nuclear plant not
only
is able to generate
extraordinarily
more
energy
than other,
but
also
it is well-known by scientists that the inherent pollution its
barely
existent.
Therefore
, by using nuclear
energy
it is
highly
likely to
reduce
diseases related to exhaust fumes such as asthma or even emphysema.

Another pertinent point is that had it not been for nuclear weapons humanity would have been on the verge of war numerous times.
Thus
, the above-mentioned
energy
has played an
extremely
important
role in modern diplomacy.
For instance
, the close-knit relationships between
different
countries took place from the moment in which nuclear weapons
were discovered
,
mainly
in order to promote preventive measures against a nuclear war.

In conclusion
, despite understanding that
many
people
do believe that
governments
should legislate and amend the law in order to ban nuclear
energy
, I disagree. I deem that we should incorporate this
energy
into our biggest cities to supply the
energy
shortage without jeopardizing their atmosphere. And
consequently
, under no circumstances should we forbid this crucial source in our world.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In recent times, due to the state-of-the-art technologies and the exponential growth witnessed in our world numerous people advocate that nuclear power might be paramount. Agree or disagree.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
299 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: