Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished. To what extent do you agree or disagree

In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished. j92kM
There has always been a controversial discussion regarding whether to punish or warn the individual who goes against the social law. Although punishing and threatening both carries significance value of their own, I personally believe in order to make sure every citizen follow the law of nation, giving punishment is more crucial than giving a second chance. Laws are formulated by the governmental bodies in order to ensure the safeguard of people. No matter how small it is, breaking a rule is a social crime which ultimately denotes unsecure social life. Leaving an individual who commits bad deeds by only giving a warning, makes other people question about their own security. The trust of common netizen will be entirely scattered. On that account, for maintaining safety of every population and to make sure they believe in social system giving punishment based upon how big the crime is very essential. For an instance, giving another chance to a robber without any punishment is a something to be given a second thought about, as nobody can guarantee no further occurrence of these kind of activities which makes social law questionable and untrustable. Secondly, it has always been a fact that people will only feel guilty about their action after facing the results. This implies in the case of crimes also. Whoever break the system feel sorry about his wrong doing only after getting punishment. After being punished once, an individual always refrain himself from doing this kind of action in future. Not only that, if one law intruder is punished, then it set as an example for everyone and other people will feel afraid from committing such actions. It is same everyone from a murder to a simple school bullying. If the murder is given death penalty rather than just threats, other people will also walk back away from doing crimes. Likewise, if school groups who bully the children are punished, then nobody will dare to bully anyone in future. Thus, punishing is extremely necessary. To recapitulate, no matter how tiny or humongous the law is, anyone who disobey it should be punished to make social security in the country. Only the thing is, punishment should be based upon the nature of crime committed.
There has always been a controversial discussion regarding whether to punish or warn the individual
who
goes against the
social
law
. Although punishing and threatening both carries significance value of their
own
, I
personally
believe in order to
make
sure every citizen follow the
law
of nation,
giving
punishment
is more crucial than
giving
a second chance.

Laws
are formulated
by the governmental bodies in order to ensure the safeguard of
people
. No matter how
small
it is, breaking a
rule
is a
social
crime
which
ultimately
denotes unsecure
social
life. Leaving an individual
who
commits
bad
deeds by
only
giving
a warning,
makes
other
people
question about their
own
security. The trust of common netizen will be
entirely
scattered. On that account, for maintaining safety of every population and to
make
sure they believe in
social
system
giving
punishment
based upon how
big
the
crime
is
very
essential. For an instance,
giving
another chance to a robber without any
punishment
is a something to be
given
a second
thought
about, as nobody can guarantee no
further
occurrence of
these kind
of activities which
makes
social
law
questionable and
untrustable
.

Secondly
, it has always been a fact that
people
will
only
feel guilty about their action after facing the results. This implies in the case of
crimes
also
. Whoever break the system feel sorry about his
wrong
doing
only
after getting
punishment
. After being
punished
once, an individual always refrain himself from doing this kind of action
in future
. Not
only
that, if one
law
intruder is
punished
, then it set as an example for everyone and other
people
will feel
afraid from
committing such actions. It is same everyone from a murder to a simple school bullying. If the murder is
given
death penalty
rather
than
just
threats, other
people
will
also
walk back away from doing
crimes
.
Likewise
, if school groups
who
bully the children are
punished
, then nobody will dare to bully anyone
in future
.
Thus
, punishing is
extremely
necessary.

To recapitulate, no matter how tiny or humongous the
law
is, anyone
who
disobey it should be
punished
to
make
social
security in the country.
Only
the thing is,
punishment
should
be based
upon the nature of
crime
committed.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
372 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts