It is sometimes argued that doctors and teachers fresh out of universities should be required to work in rural regions for several decades. While I admit that this scheme makes sense to some extent, I do believe that having such mandatory service could backfire. (没有be)
I can understand why some people want newly-graduated doctors and teachers to work in the countryside. For people living in rural areas, if the government makes working in the countryside compulsory for new doctors and teachers, many of whom would otherwise work in large cities for a lucrative career, they would be on a position to access advanced medical care and education services provided by well-educated professionals. It therefore could be argued that this policy could serve the function of extending rural dwellers' life expectancy, fostering the next generation possessing expertise and knowledge, and therefore boosting local economic growth. For doctors and teachers who are fresh from universities, working in rural areas would provide them the opportunity of translating theoretical knowledge into practice and advancing practical skills, thus building up their confidence early on in their careers. Such chances are less available in the working world in urban areas where many experienced senior doctors and teachers dominate the workplace, leaving few opportunities of hands-on learning for newcomers.
Nevertheless, I still believe that the benefit of forcing university graduates to work in rural areas could not justify its negative impacts. Firstly, such mandatory service is unfair for students graduating with huge students loans that require them to pay off as the salaries in underdeveloped areas are generally lower than that in big cities. Secondly, it would cause resentment and demotivation among young physicians and teachers who are sent to rural regions against their will, leading to job dissatisfaction and undesirable working performance.
Lastly, the greater concern is that when it comes time for these doctors and teachers to relocate to cities, they may find it difficult to catch up with the rapidly changing work environment in developed areas after working for several decades in rural areas where have limited access to cutting-edge technology and continual education.
In conclusion, although it is not unreasonable to require doctors and teachers who newly graduate from universities to work in the countryside, to my mind, having such requirement compulsory could do more harm than good.
It is
sometimes
argued that
doctors
and
teachers
fresh out of
universities
should
be required
to
work
in
rural
regions for several decades. While I admit that this scheme
makes
sense to
some
extent, I do believe that having such mandatory service could backfire. (
没有be
)
I can understand why
some
people
want
newly
-graduated
doctors
and
teachers
to
work
in the countryside. For
people
living in
rural
areas
, if the
government
makes
working
in the countryside compulsory for new
doctors
and
teachers
,
many
of whom would
otherwise
work
in large cities for a lucrative career, they would be on a position to access advanced medical care and education services provided by well-educated professionals. It
therefore
could
be argued
that this policy could serve the function of extending
rural
dwellers&
#039; life expectancy, fostering the
next
generation possessing expertise and knowledge, and
therefore
boosting local economic growth. For
doctors
and
teachers
who are fresh from
universities
,
working
in
rural
areas
would provide them the opportunity of translating theoretical knowledge into practice and advancing practical
skills
,
thus
building up their confidence early on in their careers. Such chances are less available in the
working
world in urban
areas
where
many
experienced senior
doctors
and
teachers
dominate the workplace, leaving few opportunities of hands-on learning for newcomers.
Nevertheless
, I
still
believe that the benefit of forcing
university
graduates to
work
in
rural
areas
could not justify its
negative
impacts.
Firstly
, such mandatory service is unfair for students graduating with huge students loans that require them to pay off as the salaries in underdeveloped
areas
are
generally
lower than that in
big
cities.
Secondly
, it would cause resentment and
demotivation
among young physicians and
teachers
who are
sent
to
rural
regions against their will, leading to job dissatisfaction and undesirable
working
performance.
Lastly
, the greater concern is that when it
comes
time for these
doctors
and
teachers
to relocate to cities, they may find it difficult to catch up with the
rapidly
changing
work
environment in developed
areas
after
working
for several decades in
rural
areas
where have limited access to cutting-edge technology and continual education.
In conclusion
, although it is not unreasonable to require
doctors
and
teachers
who
newly
graduate from
universities
to
work
in the countryside, to my mind, having such requirement compulsory could do more harm than
good
.