Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In many countries, television shows many foreign-made Programmes. The dominance of imported entertainment is harmful to the cultures of these countries. To what extent to you agree or disagree?

In many countries, television shows many foreign-made Programmes. The dominance of imported entertainment is harmful to the cultures of these countries. rNm2

In several countries, most overseas Programmes are aired on television, and these Programmes are contained detrimental effects on the norms of nations. While these Programmes have also benefited, I agree that there are many wide-ranging issues those telecasts bring with them. On the one hand, I agree that from these Programmes people can learn about cultures from other countries. This means that they can learn how those people live; moreover, what they eat, and how they greet each other. For example, people who are ready to go to other cultures for exchange Programmes if they already know other traditions can easily indulge in those nations. However, I believe that this is not fair in various ways. Nevertheless, I believe that it harms the lifestyles of native people. This means that people especially children are more likely to keep the practices of foreign cultures, so they gradually forget about the traditional norms from their own cultures. Besides, there are some things which vary from religion to religion, and children have an immature mind. If they watch their methods of preaching, they can distract themselves from their religion. Therefore, it is not good practice. In conclusion, although foreign films increase an individual’s knowledge, it seems to me that it’s the greatest distraction from any country’s norms and preaching.

In several countries, most overseas Possible spelling mistake. 'Programmes' is British English.Programs
Programmes
are aired
 on television, and these Possible spelling mistake. 'Programmes' is British English.Programs
Programmes
are contained
 detrimental effects on the norms of nations. While these Possible spelling mistake. 'Programmes' is British English.Programs
Programmes
 have also
 benefited, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 wide-ranging issues those telecasts bring with them.

On the one hand, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that from these Possible spelling mistake. 'Programmes' is British English.Programs
Programmes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 can learn about You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfashionartabilitysciencepracticeexperience
cultures
 from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 countries. This means that they can learn how those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
; moreover
, what they eat, and how they greet each You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
. For example
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who are ready to go to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfashionartabilitysciencepracticeexperience
cultures
 for exchange Possible spelling mistake. 'Programmes' is British English.Programs
Programmes
 if they already know You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 traditions can easily
 indulge in those nations. However
, I believe that this is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :equitable
fair
 in various ways.

Nevertheless
, I believe that it harms the lifestyles of native You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
. This means that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
especially
 children are more likely to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retain
keep
 the practices of foreign You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfashionartabilitysciencepracticeexperience
cultures
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 they gradually
 forget about the traditional norms from their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfashionartabilitysciencepracticeexperience
cultures
. Besides
, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 things which vary from religion to religion, and children have an immature mind. If they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitor
watch
 their methods of preaching, they can distract themselves from their religion. Therefore
, it is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 practice.

In conclusion
, although foreign films increase an individual’s knowledge, it seems to me that it’s the greatest distraction from any country’s norms and preaching. 