In many countries, public health issues relating to people's food choice and nutrition have been on the rise. While others argue that the choice of food should be up to individuals, i believe that government interventions would be important in order to enhance public health
On the one hand, food choices depending on tastes and socio-economic status lies with each individual. Specifically, diet choice should be integral to individual right and freedom which rely on personal nutritional needs and various eating habits. Therefore, the government is not in a position to intervene or restrict people from consuming the foods of their choice. Furthermore, living in the digital era enables people to have easy access to information about nutrition and diet, prompting them to be more empowered to make their own decisions regarding their food intake. With a fast-paced lifestyle, occupied people tend to choose convenient products, which explains a growing demand for pre-prepared meals and pre-cooked foods. Provided that they weigh up the pros and cons when planning their meals, they will maintain a healthy diet up to individual choice.
However, i would argue that government interventions in terms of issuing a system of law regulating food nutrition and restricting unhealthy options are critical to public health. The authorities should implement policies against the consumption of junk food, which can reserve the rights of food consumers and make them more health-conscious individuals accountable for their own diet and health. For instance, food suppliers should display nutritional information and portion sizes on products' packaging. Thenceforth, consumers would become more informed and fully aware of the ingredients and nutrients of certain types of foods. Besides that, the government can take actions such as increasing taxing unhealthy food options and forcing fast food restaurants to diversify their menus, which could curb junk food consumption and reduce the risks of related diseases among consumers.
In conclusion, despite arguments for the right to decide our meals, i am more of the opinion that the government should meddle in selection of food to ensure public health.
In
many
countries,
public
health
issues relating to
people
's
food
choice
and nutrition have been on the rise. While others argue that the
choice
of
food
should be up to
individuals
,
i
believe that
government
interventions would be
important
in order to enhance
public
health
On the one hand,
food
choices
depending on tastes and
socio-economic
status lies with
each
individual
.
Specifically
, diet
choice
should be integral to
individual
right and freedom which rely on personal nutritional needs and various eating habits.
Therefore
, the
government
is not in a position to intervene or restrict
people
from consuming the
foods
of their
choice
.
Furthermore
, living in the digital era enables
people
to have easy access to information about nutrition and diet, prompting them to be more empowered to
make
their
own
decisions regarding their
food
intake. With a
fast
-paced lifestyle, occupied
people
tend to choose convenient products, which
explains
a growing demand for
pre-prepared
meals and
pre-cooked
foods
. Provided that they weigh up the pros and cons when planning their meals, they will maintain a healthy diet up to
individual
choice.
However
,
i
would argue that
government
interventions in terms of issuing a system of law regulating
food
nutrition and restricting unhealthy options are critical to
public
health
. The authorities should implement policies against the consumption of junk
food
, which can reserve the rights of
food
consumers and
make
them more health-conscious
individuals
accountable for their
own
diet and
health
.
For instance
,
food
suppliers should display nutritional information and portion sizes on products' packaging. Thenceforth, consumers would become more informed and
fully
aware of the ingredients and nutrients of certain types of
foods
.
Besides
that, the
government
can take actions such as increasing taxing unhealthy
food
options and forcing
fast
food
restaurants to diversify their menus, which could curb junk
food
consumption and
reduce
the
risks
of related diseases among consumers.
In conclusion
, despite arguments for the right to decide our meals,
i
am more of the opinion that the
government
should meddle in selection of
food
to ensure
public
health
.