In recent decades, marvelous schools and medical amenities are solely accessible in urban areas all over the globe. It is considered by some people that teachers and doctors who are noval in these fields ought to work in villages in order to help their countries become successful with young descendants, while there are others who think that government should give freedom to everybody to select their own working place. In my opinion, specialists in education and medical spheres should gain experience in countrysides after graduation.
On the one hand, government should let staffs choose their own working areas so as to increase the productivity. Firstly, if professionals do not have rights to decide where they work, they will have tendency to lose the savour in their jobs. This leads to genuinely tremendous troubles including listlessness among teachers and doctors, because of unwilling atmosphere and spending money for useless approach. For this reason, they ought to make decisions where they want to work. Secondly, they will migrate to another wealthy countries in order to work in their dreamy places with their well-qualified jobs.
On the other hand, government should provide an incentive for employees whose professions are teachers and doctors to keep on their carier in rural areas for a few years due to the lack of interests and the lack of belief in medical system among people. They should be urged to work there and provide with great encouragement to the population of villages. After all, young generations start being interested in those occupations. Additionally, people are moving to city centres to get educational qualifications or find treatment to their diseases and it leads to overpopulation in cities. If new teachers and doctors pay a visit to places where are far from urban areas, government will be able to deprive the overpopulation in cities.
In conclusion, taking new staffs to countrysides will be more effective and worthwhile than giving freedom to them for developing countries successfully.
In recent decades, marvelous schools and medical amenities are
solely
accessible in urban
areas
all over the globe. It
is considered
by
some
people
that
teachers
and
doctors
who are
noval
in these fields ought to
work
in villages in order to
help
their countries become successful with young descendants, while there are others who
think
that
government
should give freedom to everybody to select their
own
working place. In my opinion, specialists in education and medical spheres should gain experience in countrysides after graduation.
On the one hand,
government
should
let
staffs choose their
own
working
areas
so as to
increase the productivity.
Firstly
, if professionals do not have rights to decide where they
work
, they will have tendency to lose the
savour
in their jobs. This leads to
genuinely
tremendous troubles including listlessness among
teachers
and
doctors
,
because
of unwilling atmosphere and spending money for useless approach.
For this reason
, they ought to
make
decisions where they want to
work
.
Secondly
, they will migrate to another wealthy countries in order to
work
in their dreamy places with their well-qualified jobs.
On the other hand
,
government
should provide an incentive for employees whose professions are
teachers
and
doctors
to
keep
on their
carier
in rural
areas
for a few years due to the lack of interests and the lack of belief in medical system among
people
. They should
be urged
to
work
there and provide with great encouragement to the population of villages.
After all
, young generations
start
being interested
in those occupations.
Additionally
,
people
are moving to city
centres
to
get
educational qualifications or find treatment to their diseases and it leads to overpopulation in cities. If new
teachers
and
doctors
pay a visit to places where are far from urban
areas
,
government
will be able to deprive the overpopulation in cities.
In conclusion
, taking new staffs to countrysides will be more effective and worthwhile than giving freedom to them for
developing countries
successfully
.