It is true that video surveillance has become commonplace in many cities in recent years. While I understand that critics may see this as an invasion of privacy, I believe that the benefits do outweigh the drawbacks. The main drawback of using video surveillance cameras is that they invade our privacy, in the sense that we are constantly being watched by the authorities or by private security firms. Many people find this intrusive and feel that the recording of their movements is a form of state control that curtails their individual freedom. Thus, they are likely to be against the use of such cameras in public places. However, private information recorded by this camera is not shared and people are likely to adapt to them. Thus / In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I believe that the use of video cameras to monitor public areas is mostly a positive measure. The key objective of video surveillance is to deter criminals and to prevent crime. For example, petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets are less likely parts of cities where they know that they are being watched. At the same time, when crimes are committed, the police can use video evidence to catch and prosecute offenders. Therefore, video cameras offer valuable support to police officers, and they make cities safer for inhabitants, workers and visitors alike. to operate in In conclusion, it seems to me that we gain more than we lose from the enhanced security that CCTV cameras bring to our cities. (drawbacks are outweighed by advantages)
It is true that
video
surveillance has become commonplace in
many
cities
in recent years. While I understand that critics may
see
this as an invasion of privacy, I believe that the benefits do outweigh the
drawbacks
. The main
drawback
of using
video
surveillance
cameras
is that they invade our privacy, in the sense that we are
constantly
being
watched
by the authorities or by private security firms.
Many
people
find this intrusive and feel that the recording of their movements is a form of state control that curtails their individual freedom.
Thus
, they are likely to be against the
use
of such
cameras
in public places.
However
, private information recorded by this
camera
is not shared and
people
are likely to adapt to them.
Thus
/
In spite of
the
drawbacks
mentioned above, I believe that the
use
of
video
cameras
to monitor public areas is
mostly
a
positive
measure. The key objective of
video
surveillance is to deter criminals and to
prevent
crime.
For example
, petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets are less likely parts of
cities
where they know that they are being
watched
. At the same time, when crimes
are committed
, the police can
use
video
evidence to catch and prosecute offenders.
Therefore
,
video
cameras
offer valuable support to police officers, and they
make
cities
safer for inhabitants, workers and visitors alike.
to
operate in
In conclusion
, it seems to me that we gain more than we lose from the enhanced security that CCTV
cameras
bring to our
cities
.
(drawbacks
are outweighed
by advantages)