Nowadays, not only had several business institutions restricted smoking, but there are some nations banned this from public places as well. There is an opinion that this prohibition is considered as inversion to the personal freedom, according to some. I, personally believe that it is a positive movement since this can uplift both public and society.
Although whatever inhaling substances may stimulate human brain and mental activities, more often than not, this leads - a problem which is physical dependability towards these drugs and it is extremely difficult to get ride of it, even one wants to. Therefore, being banned, smoking from public places such as parks, cinemas, and hospitals can limit gravity of this problem for certain extend as smokers are not allowed smoke continuously, so it is naive to think that criminalising smoking is stealing privacy. By contrast, if young generation, children, started, who are easily manipulated, by viewing adults' smoking habit, the depth of the repercussions of this would not be measurable due to its severity.
Yet, another reason to consider this prohibition is acceptable is that it enables the governments to channelize funds which had spent on treating complications of smoking for more pressing problematic sectors: women empowerment, settlement of vulnerable people, and crime in the society. By punishing smokers, it can set an example for others, especially for the future generation. Similarly, the number of many passive smokers and their both health and personal difficulties could be reduced proportionately.
By way of conclusion, while there are some disagreements against criminalising smoking in public places, I reaffirm that the governments' this action is welcomed because this has been saving millions of lives all over the world daily. It is suggested that the complete ban on smoking would be even better.
Nowadays, not
only
had several business institutions restricted
smoking
,
but
there are
some
nations banned this from
public
places
as well
. There is an opinion that this prohibition
is considered
as inversion to the personal freedom, according to
some
. I,
personally
believe that it is a
positive
movement since this can uplift both
public
and society.
Although whatever inhaling substances may stimulate human brain and mental activities, more
often
than not, this leads
-
a problem which is physical dependability towards these drugs and it is
extremely
difficult to
get
ride
of it, even one wants to.
Therefore
,
being banned
,
smoking
from
public
places such as parks, cinemas, and hospitals can limit gravity of this problem for certain
extend
as smokers are not
allowed
smoke
continuously
,
so
it is naive to
think
that
criminalising
smoking
is stealing privacy. By contrast, if young generation, children,
started
, who are
easily
manipulated, by viewing adults'
smoking
habit, the depth of the repercussions of this would not be measurable due to its severity.
Yet
, another reason to consider this prohibition is acceptable is that it enables the
governments
to channelize funds which had spent on treating complications of
smoking
for more pressing problematic sectors: women empowerment, settlement of vulnerable
people
, and crime in the society. By punishing smokers, it can set an example for others,
especially
for the future generation.
Similarly
, the number of
many
passive smokers and their both health and personal difficulties could be
reduced
proportionately
.
By way of conclusion, while there are
some
disagreements against
criminalising
smoking
in
public
places, I reaffirm that the
governments
' this action
is welcomed
because
this has been saving millions of
lives
all over the world daily. It
is suggested
that the complete ban on
smoking
would be even better.