In a number of countries, some people thinks it’s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In a number of countries, some people thinks it’s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. 2bljk
In many regions around the world, a large number of people argue that some money should be used to construct high-speed trains between cities. On the other hand, some people suggest that upgrading public transports using this money are more preferred. In this essay, I want to outline both sides and attempt to conclude.
Nowadays, people choose to move to another place where further away from cities because house prices are slightly affordable than in big cities. The high-speed train needed to travel a greater distance in short times. In addition, traveling using fast trains possibly reduce cost and travel time when people want to visit relatives or conduct business. In other words, people may not buy a plane ticket which has a higher price or spend a long and uncomfortable journey. Nevertheless, the cost to build the high-speed railway system is very high; therefore, this can be used for others requirements.
This idea leads to a new solution to improve public transportation. Recently, many old buses produce a lot of smoke which leads to the increase of pollution in the world. As a consequence, the way to solve this problem is to improve public transport to become environmentally friendly. This means that the gas produced would not produce harmful emissions. An electrical bus, for instance, can be used as one a solution to reduce pollutants.
In summary, having high-speed trains in the cities gives benefits to connect people in the cities; however, the construction needs a higher cost. Hence, improving public transport can be used as a solution before taking a new plan.
In
many
regions around the world,
a large number of
people
argue that
some
money should be
used
to construct
high-speed
trains
between
cities
.
On the other hand
,
some
people
suggest that upgrading
public
transports using this money are more preferred. In this essay, I want to outline both sides and attempt
to conclude
.
Nowadays,
people
choose to
move
to another place where
further
away from
cities
because
house
prices are
slightly
affordable than in
big
cities
. The
high-speed
train
needed to travel a greater distance in short times.
In addition
, traveling using
fast
trains
possibly
reduce
cost and travel time when
people
want to visit relatives or conduct business.
In other words
,
people
may not
buy
a
plane
ticket which has a higher price or spend a long and uncomfortable journey.
Nevertheless
, the cost to build the
high-speed
railway system is
very
high;
therefore
, this can be
used
for others requirements.
This
idea
leads to a new solution to
improve
public
transportation. Recently,
many
old
buses produce
a lot of
smoke which leads to the increase of pollution in the world. As a consequence, the way to solve this problem is to
improve
public
transport to become
environmentally
friendly. This means that the gas produced would not produce harmful emissions. An electrical bus,
for instance
, can be
used
as one a solution to
reduce
pollutants.
In summary, having
high-speed
trains
in the
cities
gives benefits to connect
people
in the
cities
;
however
, the construction needs a higher cost.
Hence
, improving
public
transport can be
used
as a solution
before
taking a new plan.