Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

If you are required to give feedback about your classmates/colleagues (work or performance), would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first? v.2

If you are required to give feedback about your classmates/colleagues (work or performance), would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first? v. 2
There is no doubt that nowadays, giving feedback plays a key role in breakthrough. Due to its paramount importance, no one can deny the direct and indirect effects of reviewing on progressing. Even though some people are inclined toward the opinion that giving positive comments to friends should be prior, some others may take an opposite viewpoint. From my vantage point, the latter belief is true. In what follows, I pinpoint my compelling reasons to vindicate my perspective. The first noteworthy reason regarding the issue is that first comment has more effects than another comment. It axiomatic that when you are listening to your friends' belief about your work, you pay attention more to their first comment. It is obvious that when our friends ask us to give them our feedback, they eager to identify their weak point in order to improve their work quality. For instance, last year, one of my friends was working on his final project and he requested me to review his thesis, although he had done his project roughly flawless, I bold its defect first. After that I commented of his work positively but he just thought about problems and did not pay attention to me a lot. Consequently, he focused on the weakness carefully and fix them up. Thanks to my precious experience which was a case in point, I daresay that we should give negative feedback first. The second pivotal point that I want to delve into is that when you start your review first with concentrating on negative feedback, you have more time to find a solution to fix it. It means that you have enough time to think about a practical way to efface the weakness while you are talking about a strengthen point of your friends' work. Besides, some of negative feedbacks will be solved by some issues which are included in positive. To shed light on the reason, I would like to draw your attention to my personal experience. When I was a sophomore in university, I had to work on final projects which are related to my major course. After I had done it, I visited my T. A. to take her feedback about my work. In this project I should simulate a telecommunication system with mathematical model and block diagram. Firstly, she focused on my block diagram and she said that it was not appropriate for your project, but as a time goes on, she found my mathematical model very swell and later that she said that she thought about my block diagram problem during his giving positive feedback and found its solution finally. Ultimately, she suggested me to pursue my project at mathematical content. I believe that it is a good example because had my T. A. not focused on my weakness, I would not have solved my problem by my strengthen point. To recapitulate the discussion of the all points mentioned above, I should state that giving negative feedback is more sensible. Not only has first comment more effect, but also you have an enough time to find a solution for weak points. It is hard to disguise the fact that when our friends ask us, they want to find the flaw of their work. All in all, it is anticipated that we give negative comments first.
There is no doubt that nowadays,
giving
feedback
plays a key role in breakthrough. Due to its paramount importance, no one can deny the direct and indirect effects of reviewing on progressing.
Even though
some
people
are inclined
toward the opinion that
giving
positive
comments
to
friends
should be prior,
some
others may take an opposite viewpoint. From my vantage
point
, the latter belief is true. In what follows, I pinpoint my compelling reasons to vindicate my perspective.

The
first
noteworthy reason regarding the issue is that
first
comment
has more effects than another
comment
.
It
axiomatic that when you are listening to your
friends&
#039; belief about your
work
, you pay attention more to their
first
comment
. It is obvious that when our
friends
ask us to give them our
feedback
, they eager to identify their weak
point
in order to
improve
their
work
quality.
For instance
, last year, one of my
friends
was working on his final
project and
he requested me to review his thesis, although he had done his
project
roughly flawless, I bold its defect
first
. After that I commented of his
work
positively
but
he
just
thought
about problems and did not pay attention to me a lot.
Consequently
, he focused on the weakness
carefully
and
fix
them up. Thanks to my precious experience which was a case in
point
, I daresay that we should give
negative
feedback
first
.

The second pivotal
point
that I want to delve into is that when you
start
your review
first
with concentrating on
negative
feedback
, you have more
time
to find a solution to
fix
it. It means that you have
enough
time
to
think
about a practical way to efface the weakness while you are talking about
a strengthen
point
of your
friends&
#039;
work
.
Besides
,
some
of
negative
feedbacks
will
be solved
by
some
issues which
are included
in
positive
. To shed light on the reason, I would like to draw your attention to my personal experience. When I was a sophomore in university, I had to
work
on final
projects
which
are related
to my major course. After I had done it, I visited my T. A. to take her
feedback
about my
work
. In this
project
I should simulate a telecommunication system with mathematical model and block diagram.
Firstly
, she focused on my block
diagram and
she said that it was not appropriate for your
project
,
but
as a
time
goes on, she found my mathematical model
very
swell and later that she said that she
thought
about my block diagram problem during his
giving
positive
feedback
and found its solution
finally
.
Ultimately
, she suggested me to pursue my
project
at mathematical content. I believe that it is a
good
example
because
had my T. A. not focused on my weakness, I would not have solved my problem by my strengthen point.

To recapitulate the discussion of the all
points
mentioned above, I should state that
giving
negative
feedback
is more sensible. Not
only
has
first
comment
more effect,
but
also
you have an
enough
time
to find a solution for weak
points
. It is
hard
to disguise the fact that when our
friends
ask us, they want to find the flaw of their
work
. All in all, it
is anticipated
that we give
negative
comments
first
.
16Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
60Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay If you are required to give feedback about your classmates/colleagues (work or performance), would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first? v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
552 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts