Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the recent years, transportation has become an important concern for the governments. The question is whether governments should allocate more budget to railways or building more roads. In my opinion, there should be more rail tracks and trains rather than roads. I will amplify this argument by using some suitable examples before drawing a reasoned conclusion. To begin with, the speed of trains is a factor of utmost importance which has led to foster the need of railways. In other words, trains can cover long distances in a short time. It is due to the reason that trains have a clear track and they do not have to face any blockages like automobiles do on the roads. According to a recent research conducted by the Transportation Department of Norway, the people of Norway could able to save 3 hours of their commute due to the trains. Additionally, railways are also contributing several positive effects to the environment. This is to say that adding more trains is resulting in lesser number of vehicles on the road. As a result, carbon dioxide and other toxic gases emitted by the combustion engines, the major cause of the air pollution, are decreasing. The head of the Department of Environmental Sciences in South Wales University, Prof. Jarrett Fisher states in their recent research that adding the number of trains in the railways is ultimately reducing the amount of carbon dioxide and ammonia in the air. To conclude, by analyzing the above-mentioned argument, it can be shown clearly that it presents a solid evidence. Therefore, if governments invest more in railways than roads, it will be a welcome move and ultimately people will enjoy fast and affordable transportation along with a pollution free environment.
In the recent years, transportation has become an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
concern for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
. The question is whether
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should allocate more budget to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
or building more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. In my opinion, there should be more rail
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tracks
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
rather
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. I will amplify this argument by using
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
suitable examples
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
drawing a reasoned conclusion.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, the speed of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
is a factor of utmost importance which has led to foster the need of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
.
In other words
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
can cover long distances in a short time. It is due to the reason that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
have a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
track and
they do not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
face any blockages like automobiles do on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. According to a recent research conducted by the Transportation Department of Norway, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
of Norway
Did you mean “could be able”?
could able
to save 3 hours of their commute due to the trains.

Additionally
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
are
also
contributing several
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
effects to the environment. This is to say that adding more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
is resulting in lesser number of vehicles on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
.
As a result
, carbon dioxide and other toxic gases emitted by the combustion engines, the major cause of the air pollution, are decreasing. The head of the Department of Environmental Sciences in South Wales University, Prof. Jarrett Fisher states in their recent research that adding the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
is
ultimately
reducing the amount of carbon dioxide and ammonia in the air.

To conclude
, by analyzing the above-mentioned argument, it can
be shown
clearly
that it presents a solid evidence.
Therefore
, if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
invest more in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
, it will be a welcome
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
and
ultimately
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will enjoy
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
and affordable transportation along with a pollution free environment.

IELTS essay Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
289 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?