Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

GOVERNMENTS SHOULD SPEND MORE MONEY ON RAILWAYS RATHER THAN ROADS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?

GOVERNMENTS SHOULD SPEND MORE MONEY ON RAILWAYS RATHER THAN ROADS. Aj5PL
These days, it is argued by some that government have to invest more money in railways instead of roads. Personally, although I believe that both rails and roads need to have a high investment to be well maintained and to ensure safety to the entire society, spending more public money on public transport might be a good idea to encourage people to take it rather than their own car. Moreover, doing that, pollution would be reduced. In this modern era where transport is really important due to the fact that it is becoming increasingly common to get around all the time, it cannot be denied that it is needed to invest a big amount of public budget in enhancing the infrastructure of all of them to ensure people a safe and comfortable trip not only in roads but also travelling in public transport around their countries. For example, roads full of holes need to be fixed immediately to prevent cars from having an accident. On the other hand, despite what has been said, it could be beneficial to spend even more public money improving public transport. For instance, the construction of more railways to get around easily and quickly from one country to the other, it would be a great idea to encourage people to use more public transport regularly rather than taking their cars or a plane. This initiative would prevent the environment from more air pollution caused by carbon dioxide from cars and planes. On top of that, it would also be advantageous for those who waste their time in traffic jumps every day and to avoid noise pollution provoked by them. To conclude, although both railways and roads need a big investment every year to maintain them properly, I believe that it could be a good idea to spend more public money on trains to encourage people to use them. That can drive to have better air quality and noise pollution might be reduce.
These days, it
is argued
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
invest more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
in railways
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
.
Personally
, although I believe that both rails and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
need to have a high investment to be well maintained and to ensure safety to the entire society, spending more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
might be a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
to encourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to take it
rather
than their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
.
Moreover
, doing that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
would be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
.

In this modern era where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
is
really
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
due to the fact that it is becoming
increasingly
common to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
around all the time, it cannot
be denied
that it
is needed
to invest a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
budget in enhancing the infrastructure of all of them to ensure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
a safe and comfortable trip not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
travelling in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
around their countries.
For example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
full of holes need to be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fixed
immediately to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
from having an accident.

On the other hand
, despite what has
been said
, it could be beneficial to spend even more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
improving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
For instance
, the construction of more railways to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
around
easily
and
quickly
from one country to the other, it would be a great
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
to encourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
regularly
rather
than taking their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
or a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plane
. This initiative would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
the environment from more air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
caused by carbon dioxide from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
planes
.
On top of that
, it would
also
be advantageous for those who waste their time in traffic jumps every day and to avoid noise
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
provoked by them.

To conclude
, although both railways and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
need a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
investment every year to maintain them
properly
, I believe that it could be a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
to spend more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on trains to encourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
them. That can drive to have better air quality and noise
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
might be
Consider using the past participle "reduced"?
reduce
.

IELTS essay GOVERNMENTS SHOULD SPEND MORE MONEY ON RAILWAYS RATHER THAN ROADS.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
327 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • GOVERNMENTS SHOULD SPEND MORE MONEY ON RAILWAYS RATHER THAN ROADS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?