Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement. gBxd
It is sometimes argued that governments around the globe should invest more money into railways which bring lots of benefits for their citizens. While others may insist that governments should put their budget to develop the infrastructure for road transportation in the future. In my opinion, I would say that building roads would be more useful for people rather than creating and upgrading railways. First of all, it can be claimed the improvement of road networks should be prioritised. One of the main reasons is that advanced road systems can bring accessibility easily for people and services. For instance, if you are a student, then it would be a huge time consuming to get to the school without roads. Furthermore, another reason can be that driving their own cars gives individuals the freedom and convenience to go wherever they like to make a higher quality of life. Therefore, the development of roads is vital for citizens' lives. Secondly, people are using the roads the most and there are limited alternative transportations for that. Imagine, if you are living on the mainland, it is difficult to move between places by trains. Oppositely, there are many alternative ways to replace trains in our life, such as by vehicles, motorbike, water transport and airline. As a fact, the route of trains is fixed by railway companies or governments. This issue is related to many unexpected problems of society involving traffic congestion at rush hours when many go to the same train, robbery, and wasting time for transition. This would mean that building roads can help to reduce mentioned problems. In conclusion, I believe that the governments should spend more money to develop roads rather than using it for railways as it would be beneficial for citizens.
It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
argued that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
around the globe should invest more money into railways which bring lots of benefits for their citizens. While others may insist that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
should put their budget to develop the infrastructure for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
transportation in the future. In my opinion, I would say that building
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
would be more useful for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
rather
than creating and upgrading railways.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, it can
be claimed
the improvement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
networks should be
Possible spelling mistake. 'prioritised' is British English.
prioritised
. One of the main reasons is that advanced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
systems can bring accessibility
easily
for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
and services.
For instance
, if you are a student, then it would be a huge
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
time consuming
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
to the school without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
.
Furthermore
, another reason can be that driving their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
cars gives individuals the freedom and convenience to go wherever they like to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a higher quality of life.
Therefore
, the development of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
is vital for citizens'
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
.

Secondly
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
the most and there
are limited
alternative transportations for that. Imagine, if you are living on the mainland, it is difficult to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
between places by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
.
Oppositely
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
alternative ways to replace
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
in our life, such as by vehicles, motorbike, water transport and airline. As a fact, the route of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fixed
by railway
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
. This issue
is related
to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
unexpected problems of society involving traffic congestion at rush hours when
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
go to the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
train
, robbery, and wasting time for transition. This would mean that building
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
mentioned problems.

In conclusion
, I believe that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
should spend more money to develop
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
rather
than using it for railways as it would be beneficial for citizens.

IELTS essay Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
293 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.