Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is an ongoing debate that developing rail networks is a wise decision or building of roads. Personally, I agree with the idea that investment should be spent on railway lines because it is more beneficial for all segments of society. On the one hand, I agree that the usage of cars is more flexible and time-saving. By using personal cars, someone can stop anywhere at any time. People can put all their stuff in a car; they do not need to carry the burden of luggage. Moreover, people can go to their workplace or anywhere they want to go; they do not need to stop their car at every stop like a train. In this way, cars give ease to people commute, and wider roads could compensate for a lot of cars on the road. Nevertheless, I believe that railways save the environment from air pollution and save us from traffic congestion and accidents. A lot of cars on roads emit carbon dioxide in the air, which leads to air pollution, but if they travel through rail, the number of cars reduce on roads, so lesser amount of carbon dioxide released in the air; by this, air pollution would be controlled. Furthermore, by reduction of cars on roads, due to travel by train, there will not be a traffic jam, and if there is less congestion on roads, the risk of accidents could also be minimized. Thus, rail tracks and travel on them is better. In conclusion, despite all the benefits of building up roads for cars, I believe that investment in railway lines and travel by train is more environment friendly, and also reduces injuries by accidents if there are more cars on roads.
It is an ongoing debate that developing rail networks is a wise decision or building of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
.
Personally
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that investment should
be spent
on railway lines
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is more beneficial for all segments of society.

On the one hand, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that the usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
is more flexible and time-saving. By using personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, someone can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
anywhere at any time.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
can put all their stuff in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
; they do not need to carry the burden of luggage.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
can go to their workplace or anywhere they want to go; they do not need to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
at every
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
like a train. In this way,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
give
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ease
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
commute, and wider
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
could compensate for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on the road.

Nevertheless
, I believe that railways save the environment from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
pollution and save us from traffic congestion and accidents.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
A lot of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
emit carbon dioxide in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
, which leads to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
pollution,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
if they
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
travel
through rail, the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
lesser amount of carbon dioxide released in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
; by this,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
pollution would
be controlled
.
Furthermore
, by reduction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
, due to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
travel
by train, there will not be a traffic jam, and if there is less congestion on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of accidents could
also
be minimized
.
Thus
, rail
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tracks
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
travel
on them is better.

In conclusion
, despite all the benefits of building up
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, I believe that investment in railway lines and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
travel
by train is more environment friendly, and
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduces
injuries by accidents if there are more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
286 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?