Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? v.15

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement? v. 15
According to some people, the authorities should invest in trains instead of roadways. I do not quite agree with this view. In my opinion, roads are as important as railways and hence the government should allocate appropriate funding for both. There are certainly ample reasons to spend taxpayer’s money on railways. Trains can carry more people. Also, they are eco-friendly. Unlike cars or buses they do not emit poisonous gases which pollute the air. Another advantage of using trains is that they do not get stuck in traffic. People can reach their destinations on time. Trains also tend to be faster and safer. Better still, in most countries around the world, train fares are considerably lower than bus fares or taxi fares. On the flip side, roads are equally important. The construction of railways is not possible in certain geographical areas and in such places, roads are the only mode of transport for people. Also, rail networks cannot reach every nook and corner of a country. Actually, most people use both roads and railways to commute to college or work. For example, they may take the bus or car to reach the railway station and from there they may take the train to reach their office. If there are no roads or if the existing roads are in a pathetic condition, people will have trouble reaching their destinations. In conclusion, roadways and railways are both essential for making travelling hassle free for people. Hence, I do not agree with the argument that the government should invest more on railways. Rather, it should give equal importance to both modes of transport.
According to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, the authorities should invest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
instead
of roadways. I do not quite
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this view. In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
are as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
and
hence
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should allocate appropriate funding for both.

There are
certainly
ample reasons to spend taxpayer’s money on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Trains
can carry more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
Also
, they are eco-friendly. Unlike cars or buses they do not emit poisonous gases which pollute the air. Another advantage of using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
is that they do not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
stuck in traffic.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reach
their destinations on time.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Trains
also
tend to be faster and safer. Better
still
, in most countries around the world,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
train
fares are
considerably
lower than bus fares or taxi fares.

On the flip side,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
are
equally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
. The construction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
is not possible in certain geographical areas and in such places,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
are the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
mode of transport for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
Also
, rail networks cannot
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reach
every nook and corner of a country. Actually, most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
to commute to college or work.
For example
, they may take the bus or car to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reach
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railway
station and from there they may take the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
train
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reach
their office. If there are no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
or if the existing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
are in a pathetic condition,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will have trouble reaching their destinations.

In conclusion
, roadways and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
are both essential for making travelling hassle free for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
Hence
, I do not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the argument that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should invest more on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
.
Rather
, it should give equal importance to both modes of transport.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
30Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement? v. 15

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
270 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts