People are divided on the issue of government's funding to artists. Some people opine that the state is providing remarkable support to the arts related community, however, others belive that the taxpayers money should be diverted to other important aspects such as education and employment. In my opinion, governments should focus on providing eductaion and jobs to more people.
On the one hand, the proponents of arts cite that, it is the duty of goverment to lend a helping hand to the artistic community. That is to say, cretaive people tend to form the essence of a rich cultural diversity. They tend to depict their ideology through work which gives a chance to praise their work. The long term impact of this is, more and more people tend to get familiarize with culture backgrounds of different community. Moreover, it has been widely observed that such subjects could act as a stress-buster for individuals which helps them to relief their stress by getting a chance to see the work of art. To illustrate, every month, the London art gallery tends to provide numerous pieces of paintings and sculptures which is surely fascinating to gaze. Therefore, if the governements could provide money then such events could be organized more often than ever.
On the other hand, the opponents of arts hold the view that the taxpayers money should not be wasted on creative work. Infact, majority of the people are being deprived from the basic amenities of life such as lack of education and lack of jobs. Therefore, the money collected from the ordinary people should be utilized judiciously to plummet such issues of society. Personally, I believe it is important for the higher authorities to address the issue of illetracy and unemployment as it would help to promote the society rather than promoting arts.
To conclude, it is imperative for governments to utilize money in order to promote jobs and eliminate uneducation, instead of soaring its resources on arts. Action must be taken otherwise there would be longterm distressful impact.
People
are divided
on the issue of
government
's funding to artists.
Some
people
opine that the state is providing remarkable support to the
arts
related community,
however
, others
belive
that the
taxpayers
money
should
be diverted
to other
important
aspects such as education and employment. In my opinion,
governments
should focus on providing
eductaion
and jobs to more
people
.
On the one hand, the proponents of
arts
cite that, it is the duty of
goverment
to lend a helping hand to the artistic community.
That is
to say,
cretaive
people
tend
to form the essence of a rich cultural diversity. They
tend
to depict their ideology through
work
which gives a chance to praise their
work
. The long term impact of this is, more and more
people
tend
to
get
familiarize with culture backgrounds of
different
community.
Moreover
, it has been
widely
observed that such subjects could act as a
stress
-buster for individuals which
helps
them to relief their
stress
by getting a chance to
see
the
work
of
art
. To illustrate, every month, the London
art
gallery
tends
to provide numerous pieces of paintings and sculptures which is
surely
fascinating to gaze.
Therefore
, if the
governements
could provide
money
then such
events
could
be organized
more
often
than ever.
On the other hand
, the opponents of
arts
hold the view that the
taxpayers
money
should not
be wasted
on creative
work
.
Infact
,
majority of
the
people
are being
deprived from
the basic amenities of life such as lack of education and lack of jobs.
Therefore
, the
money
collected from the ordinary
people
should
be utilized
judiciously
to plummet such issues of society.
Personally
, I believe it is
important
for the higher authorities to address the issue of
illetracy
and unemployment as it would
help
to promote the society
rather
than promoting arts.
To conclude
, it is imperative for
governments
to utilize
money
in order to promote jobs and eliminate
uneducation
,
instead
of soaring its resources on
arts
. Action
must
be taken
otherwise
there would be
longterm
distressful impact.