A myriad number of individuals consider government funding for the art is absolutely worthless and this investment should be made on other domains such as education, health and so on. I partially agree with the statement. This essay is going to articulate both sides of it with my perception in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark on, since art reflects the heritage and culture of one's country whether it is visual art or written art. It is particularly true that nowadays arts is being demolished. In this way, it is government prime duty to preserve it from extinction. If experts are to be believed that spending money on arts is also a good way of generating money and creating an employment. To elaborate it, India is a country of diversity where one can visit numerous place which are considered a genuine example of art. Every year a number of tourists come here from all around the globe in order to visit. Moreover, many tourist guides are employed there. Thus, government charges them as a form of tax and tickets fee only for showing them such places. Conseuently, there is no harm in investing huge amount of money in the upkeep of art.
On the other hand, there is no denying the fact that government has to take care of several pressing issues such as poverty, education. However, there is no harm in using funds on already built artitectures. But, there is no point of making new art related statues and esteblishments. Instead of making these. Government should try to make new schools and colleges so that every single individual get a chance to have basic education. Moreover, medical facilities should be improved. Make sure every individual who is under poverty line should avail these facilities. these are the mendatory things on which government must work.
To sum up, art symbolises the culture and traditions of one's country it should not be demolished. It's government responsibility to save art. But, it should take care of other problems also.
A myriad number of individuals consider
government
funding for the
art
is
absolutely
worthless and this investment should
be made
on other domains such as education, health and
so
on. I
partially
agree
with the statement. This essay is going to articulate both sides of it with my perception in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark on, since
art
reflects the heritage and culture of one's country whether it is visual
art
or written
art
. It is
particularly
true that nowadays
arts
is
being demolished
. In this way, it is
government
prime duty to preserve it from extinction. If experts are to
be believed
that spending money on
arts
is
also
a
good
way of generating money and creating an employment. To elaborate it, India is a country of diversity where one can visit numerous place which
are considered
a genuine example of
art
. Every year a number of tourists
come
here from all around the globe in order to visit.
Moreover
,
many
tourist guides
are employed
there.
Thus
,
government
charges them as a form of tax and tickets fee
only
for showing them such places.
Conseuently
, there is no harm in investing huge amount of money in the upkeep of art.
On the other hand
, there is no denying the fact that
government
has to
take care of several pressing issues such as poverty, education.
However
, there is no harm in using funds on already built
artitectures
.
But
, there is no point of making new
art
related statues and
esteblishments
.
Instead
of making these.
Government
should try to
make
new schools and colleges
so
that every single individual
get
a chance to have basic education.
Moreover
, medical facilities should be
improved
.
Make
sure every individual who is under poverty line should avail these facilities.
these
are the
mendatory
things on which
government
must
work.
To sum up,
art
symbolises
the culture and traditions of one's country it should not
be demolished
. It's
government
responsibility to save
art
.
But
, it should take care of other problems
also
.