Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

do you you agree or desagree. The governement shoil increase prices on unhealthy food

do you you agree or desagree. The governement shoil increase prices on unhealthy food N3P60

Modern highly processed manufactured food consists the high level of simple carbohydrates, in particularly sugars, which in turn pose a significant threat to human health. Some people believe that introducing higher prices on such product would be an effective nudge for people to decrease their consumption of those types of products. In my reckon this method would definitely facilitate the reduction of the overall consumption of processed food. Unfortunately for humans health prospects, people do enjoy products extremely high in fats and sugars. Historically those kinds food was the most nutritious, valuable and, consequently, beneficial for our ancestors survival. To put it in other words, the love for sweet food is wired in our brain, therefore it is very difficult for individuals to refuse to eat one more candy. Because of this physiological trait, it is very difficult to incentivize people to buy more expensive and less enjoyable healthy unprocessed products such as raw fruits or legumes. However, if the government imposes extra taxation on unhealthy food, making it significantly more expensive, people would start to consider healthy food as a more affordable option and more likely to choose it. Critiques might say that people should have a free choice to eat whatever type of food they want, and it is not the government’s job to tell citizens what to consume. Although, this position is quite popular among certain supporters of the liberal values, it is quite inconsistent. As far as the universal health care is funded by the state budget, personal health stops been a personal issue, but become a shared problem. Excessed sugar consumption dramatically increases risks for all types of non-commutable diseases and the treatment of those diseases cost the states enormous sum of money. In this regard, government interest is to protect the public health to safe later cost on health treatments. And, as long as people use public money to manage their cases of diabetes and cancer, they can not say that the food they eat is not government’s and public’s business. To draw a conclusion, despite some people who suggest that their food choices should not be affected by any state politics, whereas governments have to finance health care services for the public, the government should incentivize healthy food choices, and making unhealthy food less affordable is an effective way to do it.

Modern highly
 processed manufactured You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 consists the high level of simple carbohydrates, in particularly
 sugars, which in turn pose a significant threat to human You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 believe that introducing higher prices on such You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
 would be an effective nudge for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to decrease their consumption of those types of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
. In my reckon this method would definitely facilitate the reduction of the overall
 consumption of processed food.

Unfortunately for humans You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
 prospects, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 do enjoy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
extremely
 high in fats and sugars. Historically
 those Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "kinds'" or "kind's"?kinds'kind's
kinds
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 was the most nutritious, valuable and, consequently
, beneficial for our ancestors survival. To put it in other words
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :admireadore
love
 for sweet You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
is wired
 in our brain, therefore
 it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 difficult for individuals to refuse to eat one more candy. Because of this
 physiological trait, it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 difficult to incentivize You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 more expensive and less enjoyable healthy unprocessed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 such as raw fruits or legumes. However
, if the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 imposes extra taxation on unhealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
, making it significantly
 more expensive, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 to consider healthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 as a more affordable option and more likely to choose it.

Critiques might say that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should have a free choice to eat whatever type of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 they want, and it is not the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government’s
 job to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :inform
tell
 citizens what to consume. Although, this position is quite popular among certain supporters of the liberal values, it is quite inconsistent. As far as the universal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
 care is funded
 by the state budget, personal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasesdiscontinues
stops
 been a personal issue, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 become a shared problem. Possible spelling mistake found.Excesses
Excessed
 sugar consumption dramatically
 increases This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsdangers
risks
 for all types of non-commutable diseases and the treatment of those diseases cost the states enormous sum of money. In this regard, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 interest is to protect the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
 to safe later cost on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
 treatments. And, as long as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 money to manage their cases of diabetes and cancer, they can not say that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 they eat is not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government’s
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public’s
 business.

To draw a conclusion, despite This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who suggest that their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 choices should not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :impacted
affected
 by any state politics, whereas You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 finance You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenergystrengthwell-beingfitness
health
 care services for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 should incentivize healthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 choices, and making unhealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 less affordable is an effective way to do it. 