Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

government should more mony on railways then rorads .do you agrr or disagree?

government should more mony on railways then rorads. do you agrr or disagree? NBDj
there is no doubt that transportation system has been changed since many ages thats why some echelons of the society reckon that more railways should be constrcted rather than spending money on roasds. my views are with synchronisation school of thought. tfirstly, traffic congestion and problem of environment can be mitigated by adopting new railway roads because many number of people and many goods can be transferred by single train which not only reduce the cost of products and also perserve a time while a rush can be obsereved on roads at peak hours in the morning and evening by using railways it may solve automattically.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
there
is no doubt that transportation system has been
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
since
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
ages
Possible spelling mistake found
thats
why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
echelons of the society reckon that more railways should be
Possible spelling mistake found.
constrcted
rather
than spending money on
Possible spelling mistake found.
roasds
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
my
views are with
Possible spelling mistake. 'synchronisation' is British English.
synchronisation
school of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
tfirstly
, traffic congestion and problem of environment can
be mitigated
by adopting new railway roads
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: "many numbers".
many number
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
can
be transferred
by single train which not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the cost of products and
also
Possible spelling mistake found.
perserve
a time while a rush can be
Possible spelling mistake found.
obsereved
on roads at peak hours in the morning and evening by using railways it may solve
Possible spelling mistake found.
automattically
.

IELTS essay government should more mony on railways then rorads. do you agrr or disagree?

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
106 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
4.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • government should more mony on railways then rorads .do you agrr or disagree?