Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Government should increase the price of petrol , to solve traffic and pollution problem. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement?

Government should increase the price of petrol, to solve traffic and pollution problem. nVe3K
Nowadays, increasing the traffic and pollution are the major problem of many countries in the world. By increasing the price of gasoline the pollution and traffic problem would be decreased. So, I disagree with the given statement. Some people believe that increasing the price of petrol will reduce it’s use and decrease the traffic and pollution threat. If government increase the price of gasoline, the people don’t have the other enough option to use as instead of petrol. So it’s not the effective way. Moreover, middle class person would suffer greatly from the growing the amount of gasoline. Additionally, the local transportation will also increase with the price of petrol. In my point of view, instead of increasing the value of petrol, the authority should make the local transportation more effective. So, citizens can easily access it. On the other hand, it’s clearly argue that instead of choosing the higher price product, mostly humankind choose the lower price product. So, by increasing the price of gasoline, mankind will become more aware about that. Contradictory, authority should aware the individuals about the use of wind energy, solar power and so on. So, and more mankind can know about that and they will use them. Furthermore, by increasing the price of petrol, the GDP rate would also increased. Apart from this, for short distances, people would use local transportation or walking rather than personal vehicle or cars. In conclusion, increasing the price of gasoline, it would nor reduce the measure of air pollution and traffic problem, but rather than hiking the gasoline price authority should make the local transportation more effective.
Nowadays,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
are the major problem of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries in the world. By
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
problem would
be decreased
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, I disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
statement.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
Did you mean "its" (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
it’s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
and decrease the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
threat. If
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
increase the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
don’t have the other
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
option to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
as
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
it’s not the effective way.
Moreover
, middle
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
person would suffer
greatly
from the growing the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
.
Additionally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
will
also
increase with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
. In my point of view,
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the value of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
, the authority should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
more effective.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, citizens can
easily
access it.

On the other hand
, it’s
clearly
Consider using a past participle here: "argued".
argue
that
instead
of choosing the higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
product,
mostly
humankind choose the lower
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
product.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
, mankind will become more aware about that. Contradictory, authority
The word 'aware' is a noun or an adjective. A verb is missing or misspelled, or maybe a comma is missing.
should aware
the individuals about the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of wind energy, solar power and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, and more mankind can know about
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
that and
they will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
them.
Furthermore
, by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
, the GDP rate would
also
The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: "increase"
increased
. Apart from this, for short distances,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
or walking
rather
than personal vehicle or cars.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
, it would nor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the measure of air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
problem,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
rather
than hiking the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
authority should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
more effective.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Government should increase the price of petrol, to solve traffic and pollution problem.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
269 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts