In many decades, many researchers have studied the importance of government investments in various areas. In this essay, I will discuss why I strongly agree that governments should invest in public services and national security instead of throwing their money on arts.
To embark on, Governments should allocate a significant portion of their budget to community services. This is because, the idea of a government formed the necessity of meeting citizens' vital essentials, such as housing, healthcare, and so on so that they can collect taxes from their citizens. For example, a recent study by Cambridge found that wealthy nations are successful in terms of high life expectancy and high life standards compare to underprivileged nations thanks to their investments in communal activities. Therefore, it is obviously the case that there is a positive effect of governments' expenditures of social welfare on the happiness of their publics.
Secondly, Governments must budget on technological advancements. This is because, that high-tech equipment, which makes individuals` life easier and is a necessity, costs a great deal of money for the public. For instance, a new survey by BBC showed that forty percent of annual household income directly or indirectly goes to technology manufacturers in spite of causing a budget deficit. Thus, it is clearly the situation that expenditures and subsidies of governments on technology producers can stay money inside of the country rather than going to other countries as a financial benefit.
Even though governments might consider investing in arts, this is illogical to spend taxpayers money instead of improving their lives. in the future, art will be solely funded by artists or curators in spite of the ministries of governments
In  
many
 decades,  
many
 researchers have studied the importance of  
government
 investments in various areas. In this essay, I will discuss why I  
strongly
  agree
 that  
governments
 should invest in public services and national security  
instead
 of throwing their  
money
 on arts.
To embark on,  
Governments
 should allocate a significant portion of their budget to community services. This is  
because
, the  
idea
 of a  
government
 formed the necessity of meeting citizens' vital essentials, such as housing, healthcare, and  
so
 on  
so
 that they can collect taxes from their citizens.  
For example
, a recent study by Cambridge found that wealthy nations are successful in terms of high life expectancy and high life standards compare to underprivileged nations thanks to their investments in communal activities.  
Therefore
, it is  
obviously
 the case that there is a  
positive
 effect of  
governments
' expenditures of social welfare on the happiness of their  
publics
. 
Secondly
,  
Governments
  must
 budget on technological advancements. This is  
because
, that high-tech equipment, which  
makes
 individuals` life easier and is a necessity, costs a great deal of  
money
 for the public.  
For instance
, a new survey by BBC  
showed
 that forty percent of annual household income  
directly
 or  
indirectly
 goes to technology manufacturers  
in spite of
 causing a budget deficit.  
Thus
, it is  
clearly
 the situation that expenditures and subsidies of  
governments
 on technology producers can stay  
money
  inside of
 the country  
rather
 than going to other countries as a financial benefit. 
Even though
  governments
 might consider investing in arts, this is illogical to spend taxpayers  
money
  instead
 of improving their  
lives
.  
in
 the future, art will be  
solely
 funded by artists or curators  
in spite of
 the ministries of  
governments