Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extend do you agree with this statement?

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. XYbE

In many decades, many researchers have studied the importance of government investments in various areas. In this essay, I will discuss why I strongly agree that governments should invest in public services and national security instead of throwing their money on arts. To embark on, Governments should allocate a significant portion of their budget to community services. This is because, the idea of a government formed the necessity of meeting citizens' vital essentials, such as housing, healthcare, and so on so that they can collect taxes from their citizens. For example, a recent study by Cambridge found that wealthy nations are successful in terms of high life expectancy and high life standards compare to underprivileged nations thanks to their investments in communal activities. Therefore, it is obviously the case that there is a positive effect of governments' expenditures of social welfare on the happiness of their publics. Secondly, Governments must budget on technological advancements. This is because, that high-tech equipment, which makes individuals` life easier and is a necessity, costs a great deal of money for the public. For instance, a new survey by BBC showed that forty percent of annual household income directly or indirectly goes to technology manufacturers in spite of causing a budget deficit. Thus, it is clearly the situation that expenditures and subsidies of governments on technology producers can stay money inside of the country rather than going to other countries as a financial benefit. Even though governments might consider investing in arts, this is illogical to spend taxpayers money instead of improving their lives. in the future, art will be solely funded by artists or curators in spite of the ministries of governments

In This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 decades, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 researchers have studied the importance of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 investments in various areas. In this essay, I will discuss why I strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 should invest in public services and national security instead
 of throwing their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 on arts.

To embark on, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
Governments
 should allocate a significant portion of their budget to community services. This is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 of a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 formed the necessity of meeting citizens' vital essentials, such as housing, healthcare, and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 on This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 that they can collect taxes from their citizens. For example
, a recent study by Cambridge found that wealthy nations are successful in terms of high life expectancy and high life standards compare to underprivileged nations thanks to their investments in communal activities. Therefore
, it is obviously
 the case that there is a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 effect of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
' expenditures of social welfare on the happiness of their Possible spelling mistake found.public
publics
.

Secondly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
Governments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 budget on technological advancements. This is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
, that high-tech equipment, which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 individuals` life easier and is a necessity, costs a great deal of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 for the public. For instance
, a new survey by BBC This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 that forty percent of annual household income directly
 or indirectly
 goes to technology manufacturers This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:notwithstanding
in spite of
 causing a budget deficit. Thus
, it is clearly
 the situation that expenditures and subsidies of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 on technology producers can stay You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "inside".inside
inside of
 the country rather
 than going to other countries as a financial benefit.

Even though
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 might consider investing in arts, this is illogical to spend taxpayers You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
instead
 of improving their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterIn
in
 the future, art will be solely
 funded by artists or curators This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:notwithstanding
in spite of
 the ministries of Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphgovernments.governments!governments?governments:governments,governments;
governments