Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

goverGovernments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

goverGovernments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement? GbbL

It has been suggestion by many experts that instead of the road transportation authority should invest their resources on railways. If asked, I differ to given statement but to a major extent. My preference would be elaborated further. There are many reasons for such an inclination. The foremost one is that railways are eco-friendly. By this I mean, trains could only run by the electricity, as a result engine of it would not emit any toxic gases into the environment. Therefore, as compared with roads, railways do not damage the nature. For instance, recently one survey proved that if state would spend their money on rail transportation so in the future 60% of environmental related problems might be crubed. Furthermore, users can have more benefits by the railways. In other words, this mode is faster than other road vehicles, so that people could save their precious time. Also, they have various facilities which make their journey more comfortable. Thus, rater than roads government need to invest their funds on it for their citizens to have better traveling experience. However, I would not forget to mention that roads provide door-to-door service. To elaborate, every part of the country being connected by the roads. Therefore, people can conveniently commute their destination without facing any problems. To conclude, it can be eventually commented that although roads connect each and every part of the city; I believe that government should sped money on railways because this transport mode is eco-friendly and citizens would have more facilities in it.

It has been suggestion by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 experts that instead
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
road
 transportation authority should invest their resources on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
. If asked, I differ to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 statement This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 to a major extent. My preference would be elaborated
further
.

There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 reasons for such an inclination. The foremost one is that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 are eco-friendly. By this I mean, trains could This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 run by the electricity, as a result
 engine of it would not emit any toxic gases into the environment. Therefore
, as compared with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 do not damage the nature. For instance
, recently one survey proved that if state would spend their money on rail transportation This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 in the future 60% of environmental related problems might be Possible spelling mistake found.curbedcubedcrumbed
crubed
. Furthermore
, users can have more benefits by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
. In other words
, this mode is faster than other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
road
 vehicles, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 could save their precious time. Also
, they have various facilities which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 their journey more comfortable. Thus
, rater than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 need to invest their funds on it for their citizens to have better traveling experience.

However
, I would not forget to mention that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
 provide door-to-door service. To elaborate, every part of the country being connected
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
. Therefore
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 can conveniently
 commute their destination without facing any problems.

To conclude
, it can be eventually
 commented that although You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
 connect each and every part of the city; I believe that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 should The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: "speed"speed
sped
 money on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 this transport mode is eco-friendly and citizens would have more facilities in it. 