Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.1
Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. v. 1
The negative implications of genetic engineering are often discussed in terms of two key areas, which are food production and the cloning of humans. Genetically modified crops are already being grown, and people are concerned that they may damage whole ecosystems as foods become resistant to diseases and natural predators. But perhaps even more worrying is the possibility that humans could be modified or cloned. Some people imagine a world in which cloned humans are used to fight wars or to provide body part replacements. Although perhaps not a threat to life on earth, the implications of such practices would be unprecedented.
A more optimistic prediction, and one that I favour, is that humans will find ways to mitigate the risks and use genetic technologies in a responsible way. From the food production perspective, genetic engineering could be the solution to famine in developing countries, if, for instance, crops can be grown more reliably in harsh conditions. From a medical perspective, scientists may use genetic engineering to produce vaccines, to cure diseases, or to correct a genetic defect before a child is born. If properly regulated, even cloning can be done in a way that improves lives. For example, the cloning of individual organs, such as a heart or kidney, could be permitted for transplant purposes.
The negative implications of genetic engineering are often discussed in terms of two key areas, which are food production and the cloning of humans. Genetically modified crops are already being grown, and people are concerned that they may damage whole ecosystems as foods become resistant to diseases and natural predators. But perhaps even more worrying is the possibility that humans could be modified or cloned. Some people imagine a world in which cloned humans are used to fight wars or to provide body part replacements. Although perhaps not a threat to life on earth, the implications of such practices would be unprecedented.
A more optimistic prediction, and one that I favour, is that humans will find ways to mitigate the risks and use genetic technologies in a responsible way. From the food production perspective, genetic engineering could be the solution to famine in developing countries, if, for instance, crops can be grown more reliably in harsh conditions. From a medical perspective, scientists may use genetic engineering to produce vaccines, to cure diseases, or to correct a genetic defect before a child is born. If properly regulated, even cloning can be done in a way that improves lives. For example, the cloning of individual organs, such as a heart or kidney, could be permitted for transplant purposes.
The
negative
implications
of
genetic
engineering
are
often
discussed in terms of two key areas, which are
food
production
and the
cloning
of
humans
.
Genetically
modified
crops
are already
being grown
, and
people
are concerned
that they may damage whole ecosystems as
foods
become resistant to
diseases
and natural predators.
But
perhaps even more worrying is the possibility that
humans
could be
modified
or
cloned
.
Some
people
imagine a world in which
cloned
humans
are
used
to fight wars or to provide body part replacements. Although perhaps not a threat to life on earth, the
implications
of such practices would
be unprecedented
.
A more optimistic prediction, and one that I
favour
, is that
humans
will find
ways
to mitigate the
risks
and
use
genetic
technologies in a responsible
way
. From the
food
production
perspective
,
genetic
engineering
could be the solution to famine in
developing countries
, if,
for instance
,
crops
can
be grown
more
reliably
in harsh conditions. From a medical
perspective
, scientists may
use
genetic
engineering
to produce vaccines, to cure
diseases
, or to correct a
genetic
defect
before
a child
is born
. If
properly
regulated, even
cloning
can
be done
in a
way
that
improves
lives
.
For example
, the
cloning
of individual organs, such as a heart or kidney, could
be permitted
for transplant purposes.
The
negative
implications
of
genetic
engineering
are
often
discussed in terms of two key areas, which are
food
production
and the
cloning
of
humans
.
Genetically
modified
crops
are already
being grown
, and
people
are concerned
that they may damage whole ecosystems as
foods
become resistant to
diseases
and natural predators.
But
perhaps even more worrying is the possibility that
humans
could be
modified
or
cloned
.
Some
people
imagine a world in which
cloned
humans
are
used
to fight wars or to provide body part replacements. Although perhaps not a threat to life on earth, the
implications
of such practices would
be unprecedented
.
A more optimistic prediction, and one that I
favour
, is that
humans
will find
ways
to mitigate the
risks
and
use
genetic
technologies in a responsible
way
. From the
food
production
perspective
,
genetic
engineering
could be the solution to famine in
developing countries
, if,
for instance
,
crops
can
be grown
more
reliably
in harsh conditions. From a medical
perspective
, scientists may
use
genetic
engineering
to produce vaccines, to cure
diseases
, or to correct a
genetic
defect
before
a child
is born
. If
properly
regulated, even
cloning
can
be done
in a
way
that
improves
lives
.
For example
, the
cloning
of individual organs, such as a heart or kidney, could
be permitted
for transplant purposes.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
74Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes