In the current high-tech era, many believe that technological advancement is increasing the gap between the wealthy and the poor people, while others think that it has the opposite effect. I believe that every stream of opinions has arguments to prove their point.
On one hand, technological developments have relatively narrowed the gap between distinctive income levels as the availability of modernity has significantly improved the life quality of those who live in poverty. For instance, people from every class can now easily afford a versatile electronic device and access the Internet - the greatest technological innovation that has connected the entire globe together. It is even easier when the Wifi hotspot is everywhere and the internet is freely available in any public place. Opportunities for researching, learning, and shopping are widely opened for anyone regardless of social parity.
On the contrary, some certain innovations have obviously made the gap become larger. For example, qualified medical treatments and facilities are extremely expensive, specifically for such dangerous illnesses like cancer, neuropathy, or heart disease. Furthermore, matters arising might even be a greater problem. Another example is that luxurious goods are also a common category that clearly points out different financial statuses. It is clear that only wealthy people can afford leading brands like Mercedes or Versace, so the chance to own a fancy item is far-fetched for those who are in an unstable economic group.
In conclusion, some technological fields do show the reduction of the gap between rich and poor whereas the other innovations show the opposite direction. However, it is strongly hoped that technology will have a good impact on people no matter how rich or how poor they are. 
In the  
current
 high-tech era,  
many
 believe that  
technological
 advancement is increasing the  
gap
 between the wealthy and the poor  
people
, while others  
think
 that it has the opposite effect. I believe that every stream of opinions has arguments to prove their point.
On one hand,  
technological
 developments have  
relatively
 narrowed the  
gap
 between distinctive income levels as the availability of modernity has  
significantly
  improved
 the life quality of those who  
live
 in poverty.  
For instance
,  
people
 from every  
class
 can  
now
  easily
 afford a versatile electronic device and access the Internet  
-
 the greatest  
technological
 innovation that has connected the entire globe together. It is even easier when the  
Wifi
 hotspot is everywhere and the internet is  
freely
 available in any public place. Opportunities for researching, learning, and shopping are  
widely
 opened for anyone regardless of social parity. 
On the contrary
,  
some
 certain innovations have  
obviously
 made the  
gap
 become larger.  
For example
, qualified medical treatments and facilities are  
extremely
 expensive,  
specifically
 for such  
dangerous
 illnesses like cancer, neuropathy, or heart disease.  
Furthermore
, matters arising might even be a greater problem. Another example is that luxurious  
goods
 are  
also
 a common category that  
clearly
 points out  
different
 financial statuses. It is  
clear
 that  
only
 wealthy  
people
 can afford leading brands like Mercedes or Versace,  
so
 the chance to  
own
 a fancy item is far-fetched for those who are in an unstable economic group. 
In conclusion
,  
some
  technological
 fields do  
show
 the reduction of the  
gap
 between rich and poor whereas the other innovations  
show
 the opposite direction.  
However
, it is  
strongly
 hoped that technology will have a  
good
 impact on  
people
 no matter how rich or how poor they are.