Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many people argue that formal examinations are a far better way than practical assessments to judge a student’s performance. I disagree with this statement to a large extent as regular course work and projects completely assess student’s knowledge and creativity at various levels Assessing students routinely is a more effective way than conducting yearly exams. To begin with, many students perform far better in their regular classes but unfortunately lacks in a pen and paper test. For instance, a brilliant student may be unable to perform to the best of his ability because of ill health. This will eventually hurt his confidence largely and can affect his performance in further exams too. Therefore, assessing the knowledge of a student on the basis of their performance in annual exams alone is not a brilliant idea. Conversely, there are those who insist that the traditional way of conducting exams judges a student’s ability effectively. They assert that exam conducting bodies meticulously organise the papers and thus every student has an equal opportunity to show their mettle in a three hour exam. While this may be true to a certain extent, I believe that these three hours are not enough to test students’ hard work and the tremendous efforts they put in throughout the year. More crucially, these exams do not assess students on their soft skills such as teamwork, communication skills and even do not take into account factors like discipline and punctuality. On the other hand, continuous assessment allows teachers to see whether students are progressing. Making them do projects and other activities is also a great way to ensure that they are applying the knowledge they learned in the classroom. To conclude, although conducting exams in a structured way can tell students’ performance in a span of three hours, these exams do not take into account specific situations that might affect a student from performing to the best of their ability. Hence, in my opinion, continuous assessment is a better way to measure the progress of students.
Many
people
argue that formal examinations are a far better way than practical assessments to judge a
student’s
performance
. I disagree with this statement to a large extent as regular course work and projects completely assess
student’s
knowledge and creativity at various
levels


Assessing
students
routinely
is a more effective way than
conducting
yearly exams. To
begin
with,
many
students
perform far better in their regular classes
but
unfortunately lacks in a pen and paper
test
.
For instance
, a brilliant
student
may be unable to perform to the best of his ability
because
of ill health. This will
eventually
hurt his confidence
largely
and can affect his
performance
in
further
exams too.
Therefore
, assessing the knowledge of a
student
on the basis of their
performance
in annual exams alone is not a brilliant
idea
.

Conversely
, there are those who insist that the traditional way of
conducting
exams judges a
student’s
ability
effectively
. They assert that exam
conducting
bodies
meticulously
organise
the papers and
thus
every
student
has an equal opportunity to
show
their mettle in a
three hour
exam. While this may be true to a certain extent, I believe that these three hours are not
enough
to
test
students’
hard
work and the tremendous efforts they put in throughout the year. More
crucially
, these exams do not assess
students
on their soft
skills
such as teamwork, communication
skills
and even do not take into account factors like discipline and punctuality.

On the other hand
, continuous assessment
allows
teachers to
see
whether
students
are progressing. Making them do projects and other activities is
also
a great way to ensure that they are applying the knowledge they learned in the classroom.

To conclude
, although
conducting
exams in a structured way can
tell
students’
performance
in a span of three hours, these exams do not take into account specific situations that might affect a
student
from performing to the best of their ability.
Hence
, in my opinion, continuous assessment is a better way to measure the progress of
students
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
337 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts