Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.4

Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know. v. 4
There is no doubt that the world will not survive for a long time if there is no sign of forests. It has already been contemplated by many individuals that the end of the forests will be putting a finish line for the society and the economy. I, therefore, tend to agree with the statement and in this essay, I will discuss my opinion with pertinent examples. The most significant problem is that without the existence of forests, nature cannot be able to maintain an ecological balance. Despite having technological advancement, the economy, which is revolving around many industries, might face regular barriers because of the imbalance of ecology. For example, if there are any no places with full of green trees and plants, many companies like Ikea will not receive any wood in the future and it will create unemployment, loss, and so forth. Furthermore, less number of forests could also hamper to maintain a decent oxygen rate in the air, whereas the carbon emission is higher than the early days. Another problem is that these forests can be the new source of unidentified virus or bacteria. That is to clarify, if these reserved areas get demolished by the people, it may unearth a new wave of disease which the world has never seen before. For instance, the recent outbreak of COVID 19 and swine flu might be affiliated with a number of wild animals from forests and many nationalists consume them without any kind of acknowledgement. Though science has accelerated our health and medical system, but it has not wielded any sword against the nature yet. To sum up, the earth is solely depending on forests to provide not only a balance between nature and the human race, but also a security from any unrecognised deadly viruses. As a vehement supporter of nature, I agree with the opinion that there will be no reality of us if we do not keep our forests and its resources intact.
There is no doubt that the world will not survive for a long time if there is no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sign
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
. It has already
been contemplated
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
individuals that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
will be putting a finish line for the society and the economy. I,
therefore
, tend to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the statement and in this essay, I will discuss my opinion with pertinent examples.

The most significant problem is that without the existence of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
cannot be able to maintain an ecological balance. Despite having technological advancement, the economy, which is revolving around
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
industries, might face regular barriers
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the imbalance of ecology.
For example
, if there are any no places with full of green trees and plants,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
like
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ikea
will not receive any wood in the future and it will create unemployment, loss, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
forth.
Furthermore
, less number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
could
also
hamper to maintain a decent oxygen rate in the air, whereas the carbon emission is higher than the early days.

Another problem is that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
can be the new source of unidentified virus or bacteria.
That is
to clarify, if these reserved areas
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
demolished by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, it may unearth a new wave of disease which the world has never
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
.
For instance
, the recent outbreak of
Did you mean "COVID-19" or the alternative spelling "Covid-19" (= coronavirus)?
COVID 19
and swine flu might
be affiliated
with a number of wild animals from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
nationalists consume them without any kind of
Possible spelling mistake. 'acknowledgement' is British English.
acknowledgement
. Though science has accelerated our health and medical system,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it has not wielded any sword against the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
yet
.

To sum up, the earth is
solely
depending on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
to provide not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
a balance between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
and the human race,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
a security from any
Possible spelling mistake. 'unrecognised' is British English.
unrecognised
deadly viruses. As a vehement supporter of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the opinion that there will be no reality of us if we do not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
and its resources intact.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know. v. 4

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
329 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts