There two main school of taught regarding the support of artists specially musicians and painters when it comes to financial aid. One group are more interested in the governmental supports while others think that more sources of money should be used to support the artists. I believe that governmental support is not a good approach.
Whenever there is governmental funding available for any sector at society there is a high chance of fiscal corruption and misuse at resources by individuals. This is true when it comes to art and the result is that the real art and creativity will be sacrificed to the benefit of come tiny group of individual who most likely have some sort of connection or old boy groups to help the being chosen as an artist who is eligible for financial support by government. consequently I think that alternative approach should be taken to promote art.
A creative artist is the one who can produce genuine work in terms of beauty and value which can attract people. Therefore, it is not a big deal for an artist to earn money and if there is a need for backing these people it shouldn't be in the form of direct payment rather, helping them to present their art-work using TV program or providing them with enough space to have an exhibition. Furthermore, alternative private organizations that can benefit from artistry of these artist such as their new design or their publication to increase their companies products quality and variety. This kind of alternatives I think can be more helpful and fair for artist.
All in all monetary backing by governments is not a good idea to promote the art in society alternative sources of support such as companies sponsorship is far realistic.
There two main school of taught regarding the
support
of
artists
specially
musicians and painters when it
comes
to financial aid. One group are more interested in the governmental
supports
while others
think
that more sources of money should be
used
to
support
the
artists
. I believe that governmental
support
is not a
good
approach.
Whenever there is governmental funding available for any sector at society there is a high chance of fiscal corruption and misuse at resources by individuals. This is true when it
comes
to art and the result is that the real art and creativity will
be sacrificed
to the benefit of
come
tiny group of individual who most likely have
some
sort of connection or
old
boy groups to
help
the
being chosen
as an
artist
who is eligible for financial
support
by
government
.
consequently
I
think
that
alternative
approach should
be taken
to promote art.
A creative
artist
is the one who can produce genuine work in terms of beauty and value which can attract
people
.
Therefore
, it is not a
big
deal for an
artist
to earn money and if there is a need for backing these
people
it shouldn't be in the form of direct payment
rather
, helping them to present their art-work using TV program or providing them with
enough
space to have an exhibition.
Furthermore
,
alternative
private organizations that can benefit from artistry of these
artist
such as their new design or their publication to increase their
companies
products quality and variety. This kind of
alternatives
I
think
can be more helpful and
fair
for artist.
All in all monetary backing by
governments
is not a
good
idea
to promote the art in society
alternative
sources of
support
such as
companies
sponsorship is far realistic.