Fees for higher education are expensive and not affordable for everyone so according to some
university should be free for all people, regardless of their background. In my opinion, offering
everyone free university education would be problematic and, therefore, should only be offered tocertain individuals.
Having free university education for everyone would put a tremendous financial strain on a country.
Universities would have no income from fees and, consequently, they would rely completely on the state for funding. Doing this means taking funds from other much needed areas, such as the health system, in order to allocate money to universities. For the majority of countries, particularly developing and underdeveloped countries, this would not be a financially viable option.
Another point to consider is that offering all people free tertiary education would tempt many
people to enter university whether they were interested or not. In other words, rather than
choosing to get a job, some young people would opt for doing a degree to which they would only half-heartedly apply themselves. This would not only be a waste of a country’s finances but also a waste of human resources.
Finally, the best solution would be to keep university fees but still offer some free places to
gifted students from poor backgrounds. This would ensure that talented, intelligent students who cannot afford to pay for higher education would still get educated and trained. As a result,
society would benefit by getting the right people trained and valuable financial resources would not be wasted.
In conclusion, abolishing university fees is not feasible for most countries but offering free
places toparticular students who have limited financial means is a much better use of a country’s resources.
Fees
for higher
education
are expensive and not affordable for everyone
so
according to
some
university
should be
free
for all
people
, regardless of their background. In my opinion,
offering
everyone
free
university
education
would be problematic and,
therefore
, should
only
be offered
tocertain
individuals.
Having
free
university
education
for everyone would put a tremendous financial strain on a country.
Universities would have no income from
fees
and,
consequently
, they would rely completely on the state for funding. Doing this means taking funds from other
much needed
areas, such as the health system, in order to allocate money to
universities
. For the majority of
countries
,
particularly
developing and underdeveloped
countries
, this would not be a
financially
viable option.
Another point to consider is that offering all
people
free
tertiary
education
would tempt
many
people
to enter
university
whether they
were interested
or not.
In other words
,
rather
than
choosing
to
get
a job,
some
young
people
would opt for doing a degree to which they would
only
half-
heartedly
apply themselves. This would not
only
be a waste of a
country’s
finances
but
also
a waste of human resources.
Finally
, the best solution would be to
keep
university
fees
but
still
offer
some
free
places to
gifted
students from poor backgrounds. This would ensure that talented, intelligent students who cannot afford to pay for higher
education
would
still
get
educated and trained.
As a result
,
society would benefit by getting the right
people
trained and valuable financial resources would not
be wasted
.
In conclusion
, abolishing
university
fees
is not feasible for most
countries
but
offering free
places
toparticular
students who have limited financial means is a much better
use
of a
country’s
resources.