explain why or why not leaders should prioritise agreeable employees over top performers (or the other way around), or whether leaders should create balanced teams.
explain why or why not leaders should prioritise agreeable employees over top performers (or the other way around), or whether leaders should create balanced teams. Q5W1L
In this day and ages, leader is wifely defined. Some people think good leaders should prioritized agreeable workers over the other type of employees. While some belief that decent leader should create balance among the team members. Apparently, considering from a resonant leader’s view, the cons of treating different employees with different actions will outweigh pros. I would stand for create a balance within the team.
Starting with the first reasons, though agreeable people are more tender, and seems to be more loyal and look forward to a caring job. Inequality action not only creates boundaries between agreeable employees and other employees, but also widen the existing boundaries between leader and other employees. Secondly, differentiation may create an awkward moment among the relationships which will cause more further relationship trouble in the future. To clarify, the one who doesn’t receive a good, tender look-after would feel the different of actions and may leads to the negative working attitude. In addition to that, in the lesson, resonant leader has been stated that our company requires more task-based leadership than relationship-based leadership.
On the other hand, try to retain the good relationship shouldn’t be done just only among the agreeable workers. Resonant leader should be able to create positive tone along with the synchronies within every member equally. Being a task-based leader doesn’t mean to be a careless leader. The resonant leader can be empathetic to their workers, treating them fairly without any conditions, done well in self-work, as well as keep the employees in the same page to get a synchronized result
In conclusion, building balance in a company will not only boost up the worker’s productivity but also create a good company’s performance in a long-run.
In this day and ages,
leader
is
wifely
defined.
Some
people
think
good
leaders
should
prioritized
agreeable
workers
over the
other
type of
employees
.
While
some
belief that decent
leader
should
create
balance among the team members.
Apparently
, considering from a
resonant
leader’s
view, the cons of treating
different
employees
with
different
actions will outweigh pros. I would stand for
create
a balance within the team.
Starting with the
first
reasons, though
agreeable
people
are more tender, and seems to be more loyal and look forward to a caring job. Inequality action not
only
creates
boundaries between
agreeable
employees
and
other
employees
,
but
also
widen the existing boundaries between
leader
and
other
employees
.
Secondly
, differentiation may
create
an awkward moment among the relationships which will cause more
further
relationship trouble in the future. To clarify, the one who doesn’t receive a
good
, tender look-after would feel the
different
of actions and may leads to the
negative
working attitude.
In addition
to that, in the lesson,
resonant
leader
has
been stated
that our
company
requires more task-based leadership than relationship-based leadership.
On the
other
hand, try to retain the
good
relationship shouldn’t
be done
just
only
among the
agreeable
workers
.
Resonant
leader
should be able to
create
positive
tone along with the
synchronies
within every member
equally
. Being a task-based
leader
doesn’t mean to be a careless
leader
. The
resonant
leader
can be empathetic to their
workers
, treating them
fairly
without any conditions, done well in self-work,
as well
as
keep
the
employees
in the same page to
get
a synchronized
result
In conclusion
, building balance in a
company
will not
only
boost up the
worker’s
productivity
but
also
create
a
good
company
’s performance in
a long-run
.