The reading and the lecture are both about the appearance of professors on TV shows. The author of the reading feels that the manifestation of university professors on TV has advantages on three different fields, professors themselves, the university they belong to and the viewers. The lecturer opposes the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that the appearance catches disadvantages to words the author
First, the author argues that the appearance of university professors on TV shows expand their audience, and also help them to be viewed by more people. This specific argument is contrasted by the lecturer. She claims that the appearance gives the professor bad impression among the others, in other words she says that professors who go on television aren’t viewed by the other professors as true educators. Moreover, showing on TV show can affect the money they get for their researches and experiments.
Second, the writer claims that the appearance can benefit the universities that the professors work in, that the universities would receive more donations and potential students apply to their university. However, the article states that having professors who appear on TV shows can make a big problem with not having enough time for their lectures. In addition, they would spend most of their time travelling, preparing for their scripts and look for the show not their university works.
Eventually, the writer posits that it is beneficial for the public if a professor appears on TV show. It is suggested that professors can use the fact that TVs are popular and that they can use to spread precious information among different stages of people. Otherwise, the lecturer believes that TVs are not the perfect places to present valuable content. She mentions that what a professor can give to the audience any other trained TV reporter can present to the audience.
The reading and the lecture are both about the
appearance
of
professors
on TV
shows
. The author of the reading feels that the manifestation of
university
professors
on TV has advantages on three
different
fields,
professors
themselves, the
university
they belong to and the viewers.
The
lecturer opposes the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that the
appearance
catches disadvantages to words the
author
First
, the author argues that the
appearance
of
university
professors
on TV
shows
expand their audience, and
also
help
them to
be viewed
by more
people
. This specific argument
is contrasted
by the lecturer. She claims that the
appearance
gives the
professor
bad
impression among the others, in
other
words she says that
professors
who go on television aren’t viewed by the
other
professors
as true educators.
Moreover
, showing on TV
show
can affect the money they
get
for their researches and experiments.
Second, the writer claims that the
appearance
can benefit the
universities
that the
professors
work in, that the
universities
would receive more donations and potential students apply to their
university
.
However
, the article states that having
professors
who appear on TV
shows
can
make
a
big
problem with not having
enough
time for their lectures.
In addition
, they would spend most of their time travelling, preparing for their scripts and look for the
show
not their
university
works.
Eventually
, the writer posits that it is beneficial for the public if a
professor
appears on TV
show
. It
is suggested
that
professors
can
use
the fact that TVs are popular and that they can
use
to spread precious information among
different
stages of
people
.
Otherwise
, the lecturer believes that TVs are not the perfect places to present valuable content. She mentions that what a
professor
can give to the audience any
other
trained TV reporter can present to the audience.