For the past few centuries, there has been a significant advancement in medical sciences. Experiments spanning over different animal species have resulted in important discoveries. Few people believe that doing testing on animals is cruel, while other argues that these experiments should continue to benefit mankind. This essay will analyse both pros and cons of conducting trials on animals.
People favouring laboratory experiments on animals argue that it is the best way to research, analyse and observe effects of different medicines before testing them on human beings. Experiments conducted over animal species have resulted in the development of vital medicines including vaccines, drugs and antibiotics. For instance, polio which was a widespread disease in the mid-nineties was developed after rigorous testing on mice and monkeys, unavailability of these experimental subjects would have left the world in an epidemic state. Moreover, animal testing helps medical students to seek the required knowledge and advance in the research domain. Researchers also aim to minimise the suffering that animal experience.
On the other hand, trials and experiments on animals are cruel and we have no moral right to take away their lives for the sake of our research work. Their existence and ecosystem should be respected. There are many alternates available to perform scientific research. In many countries, testing for the cosmetic industry on animal race in now prohibited. Moreover, experiments on animal species might not give us the same result as they have different anatomy and biological system than human beings.
To conclude, the above provide solid arguments in highlighting merits and demerits of doing experiments on animals. In my opinion, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, but research and evaluation should be done in a controlled way. The government should also set up strict policies and regulation which should keep the animal as an experimental subject in critical research purpose only.
For the past few centuries, there has been a significant advancement in medical sciences.
Experiments
spanning over
different
animal
species have resulted in
important
discoveries. Few
people
believe that doing
testing
on
animals
is cruel, while other argues that these
experiments
should continue to benefit mankind. This essay will
analyse
both pros and cons of conducting trials on animals.
People
favouring
laboratory
experiments
on
animals
argue that it is the best way to
research
,
analyse
and observe effects of
different
medicines
before
testing
them on human beings.
Experiments
conducted over
animal
species have resulted in the development of vital medicines including vaccines, drugs and antibiotics.
For instance
, polio which was a widespread disease in the mid-nineties
was developed
after rigorous
testing
on mice and monkeys, unavailability of these experimental subjects would have
left
the world in an epidemic state.
Moreover
,
animal
testing
helps
medical students to seek the required knowledge and advance in the
research
domain. Researchers
also
aim to
minimise
the suffering that
animal
experience.
On the other hand
, trials and
experiments
on
animals
are
cruel and
we have no moral right to take away their
lives
for the sake of our
research
work. Their existence and ecosystem should
be respected
. There are
many
alternates available to perform scientific
research
. In
many
countries,
testing
for the cosmetic industry on
animal
race in
now
prohibited.
Moreover
,
experiments
on
animal
species might not give us the same result as they have
different
anatomy and biological system than human beings.
To conclude
, the above provide solid arguments in highlighting merits and demerits of doing
experiments
on
animals
. In my opinion, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages,
but
research
and evaluation should
be done
in a controlled way. The
government
should
also
set up strict policies and regulation which should
keep
the
animal
as an experimental subject in critical
research
purpose
only
.