Pollution from automobiles is a major concern in the modern society, especially due to the increasing number of cars on the road. This is one of the major causes for the climate change problem the world is facing today. To address this issue, it is better for the governments to build a reliable and convenient public transportation infrastructure instead of spending money on the development of pollutionless cars. Bases for my views this solution is economical and social.
From the economical perspective, public transportation systems are cheaper choices for the people and affordable for all classes of the society. For instance, the MRT system in Singapore helps millions of people to travel daily with comfort and convenience. In addition, it generates revenue for the government as it requires one-time capital investment to set up a mass transportation system like a metro train system and to get a recurring income thereafter. In addition, such a transport system helps the public to save money in travelling and reducing their cost of living.
From the social perspective, public transport system helps the society in many ways. Less traffic on road means fewer accidents, and thus creates a safety living environment. Moreover, the roads are freely available for critical life-saving services like fire accidents, medical emergency and police operations. Also, a public transport system helps to unite all classes of people in the society by providing a uniform means of commuting. On the other hand, the private vehicles, which are of different quality and cost for the rich, average and the poor, displays the economic gap within the public in society.
In conclusion, even though pollutionless cars are good for the environment, a good public transport system is a better choice for its residents because it is not only environment-friendly but also accessible for all in the community. Hence governments should spend money to develop robust public transport systems.
Pollution from automobiles is a major concern in the modern
society
,
especially
due to the increasing number of cars on the road. This is one of the major causes for the climate
change
problem the world is facing
today
. To address this issue, it is better for the
governments
to build a reliable and convenient
public
transportation infrastructure
instead
of spending money on the development of
pollutionless
cars. Bases for my views this solution is economical and social.
From the economical perspective,
public
transportation
systems
are cheaper choices for the
people
and affordable for all classes of the
society
.
For instance
, the MRT
system
in Singapore
helps
millions of
people
to travel daily with comfort and convenience.
In addition
, it generates revenue for the
government
as it requires one-time capital investment to set up a mass transportation
system
like a metro train
system
and to
get
a recurring income thereafter.
In addition
, such a
transport
system
helps
the
public
to save money in travelling and reducing their cost of living.
From the social perspective,
public
transport
system
helps
the
society
in
many
ways. Less traffic on road means fewer accidents, and
thus
creates a safety living environment.
Moreover
, the roads are
freely
available for critical life-saving services like fire accidents, medical emergency and police operations.
Also
, a
public
transport
system
helps
to unite all classes of
people
in the
society
by providing a uniform means of commuting.
On the other hand
, the private vehicles, which are of
different
quality and cost for the rich, average and the poor, displays the economic gap within the
public
in society.
In conclusion
,
even though
pollutionless
cars are
good
for the environment, a
good
public
transport
system
is a better choice for its residents
because
it is not
only
environment-friendly
but
also
accessible for all in the community.
Hence
governments
should spend money to develop robust
public
transport
systems
.