In this modern world, perspectives of how to keep animals are varied between people. While some people believe that zoos play an important role in protecting wild animals, others feel that keeping animals locked up in such places is cruel and unnecessary. Personally, I agree with the idea that animals should not be kept in zoos and that zoos should be shut down.
On the one hand, it is believed that keeping wild animals in captivity might deprive them of their freedom. Wild animals are caged in a limited space and fed by humans while they long for a natural way of life. Therefore, many of them might suffer from boredom and confinement. Second, many governments might see zoos as an opportunity to make money. For example, many wild animals are exhibited and performed to entertain and attract visitors to the zoo. Many people claim that we have no right to use animals for entertainment and profit, so they think that zoos should be closed down.
What's more, zoos can only hold small numbers of animals and therefore cannot protect the large majority of species from being hunted or their habitats from being destroyed. Furthermore, in many zoos, animals are being mistreated as they are often provided with insufficient food and medical care, which has so far caused many animals in zoos to die because of starvation and diseases. I believe it is the responsibility of each government to create and fund conservation programs that help to stop the destruction of the habitats of endangered species so that animals can live in their natural state rather than be locked up in cages for their entire life.
On the other hand, there is an argument that zoos can help to preserve endangered animals by keeping them safe from poachers and other threats, such as habitat destruction or natural disasters. Secondly, by keeping animals in zoos, people can learn and understand more about them and this can help to raise awareness amongst the public in order to help preserve certain species.
In conclusion, though some zoos may have some positive impacts on the conservation of certain animal species. Overall, I think they are cruel places and do more harm than good. They are vulnerable creatures and they have the right to survive independently because of having feelings and emotions as humans.
T2 14: 38
Bạn đã gửi
Evaluation methods of a student’s performance have always been an area of contention around the world. While individuals believe that this can be done by continual assessment of their assignments and project work, others are in favor of formal examination. Personally, I disagree with this idea and in this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.
To begin with, the aim of the assessment is to quantify how much the student understands the taught subject in its totality. An examination is usually administered on a single taking. The outcome is determined by various circumstances factors such as whether the examination is held in a conducive atmosphere, whether the student is healthy during the time of the examination. All of them are non-academic factors that might influence the exam's outcome.
What's more, traditional exam models only focus on theoretical knowledge so I believe that formal examinations are not flexible enough to assess other qualities possessed by students. For example, practical skills and interpersonal and team-working skills such as confidence and the ability of a student to present a topic to the public.
On the other hand, there is an argument that the examination that is taken in educational institutes is a more reliable method of testing children's ability that help them try to pass the exam with flying colors in other ones if they get poor test results.
In conclusion, formal examinations are a useful means of assessment. However, I think they are not the best way to measure student performance. Because the result only reflects the score, it does not clearly reflect the actual capacity of each individual
In this modern world, perspectives of how to
keep
animals
are varied
between
people
. While
some
people
believe
that zoos play an
important
role in protecting wild
animals
, others feel that keeping
animals
locked up in such places is cruel and unnecessary.
Personally
, I
agree
with the
idea
that
animals
should not be
kept
in zoos and that zoos should
be shut
down.
On the one hand, it
is believed
that keeping wild
animals
in captivity
might
deprive them of their freedom. Wild
animals
are caged
in a limited space and fed by humans while they long for a natural way of life.
Therefore
,
many
of them
might
suffer from boredom and confinement. Second,
many
governments
might
see
zoos as an opportunity to
make
money.
For example
,
many
wild
animals
are exhibited
and performed to entertain and attract visitors to the zoo.
Many
people
claim that we have no right to
use
animals
for entertainment and profit,
so
they
think
that zoos should
be closed
down.
What's more, zoos can
only
hold
small
numbers of
animals
and
therefore
cannot protect the large majority of species from
being hunted
or their habitats from being
destroyed
.
Furthermore
, in
many
zoos,
animals
are
being mistreated
as they are
often
provided with insufficient food and medical care, which has
so
far caused
many
animals
in zoos to
die
because
of starvation and diseases. I
believe
it is the responsibility of each
government
to create and fund conservation programs that
help
to
stop
the destruction of the habitats of endangered species
so
that
animals
can
live
in their natural state
rather
than
be locked
up in cages for their entire life.
On the
other
hand, there is an argument that zoos can
help
to preserve endangered
animals
by keeping them safe from poachers and
other
threats, such as habitat destruction or natural disasters.
Secondly
, by keeping
animals
in zoos,
people
can learn and understand more about them and this can
help
to raise awareness amongst the public in order to
help
preserve certain species.
In conclusion
, though
some
zoos may have
some
positive
impacts on the conservation of certain
animal
species.
Overall
, I
think
they are cruel places and do more harm than
good
. They are vulnerable
creatures and
they have the right to survive
independently
because
of having feelings and emotions as humans.
T2 14: 38
Bạn
đã
gửi
Evaluation methods of a
student’s
performance have always been an area of contention around the world. While individuals
believe
that this can
be done
by continual assessment of their assignments and project work, others are in favor of formal
examination
.
Personally
, I disagree with this
idea
and in this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.
To
begin
with, the aim of the assessment is to quantify how much the
student
understands the taught subject in its totality. An
examination
is
usually
administered on a single taking. The outcome
is determined
by various circumstances factors such as whether the
examination
is held
in a conducive atmosphere, whether the
student
is healthy during the time of the
examination
. All of them are non-academic factors that
might
influence the exam's outcome.
What's more, traditional exam models
only
focus on theoretical knowledge
so
I
believe
that formal
examinations
are not flexible
enough
to assess
other
qualities possessed by
students
.
For example
, practical
skills
and interpersonal and team-working
skills
such as confidence and the ability of a
student
to present a topic to the public.
On the
other
hand, there is an argument that the
examination
that
is taken
in educational institutes is a more reliable method of testing children's ability that
help
them try to pass the exam with flying colors in
other
ones if they
get
poor
test
results.
In conclusion
, formal
examinations
are a useful means of assessment.
However
, I
think
they are not the best way to measure
student
performance.
Because
the result
only
reflects the score, it does not
clearly
reflect the actual capacity of each
individual