Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Ex 18: Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Ex 18: Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? r867p
Animal rights activists often try to ‘proselytize’ people based on anthropomorphic ideas claiming that it is unethical to subject animals to pain and suffering in the name of ‘good’ for humankind. However, I agree with those who say that it is a necessary evil. On the one hand, animal rights advocates justifiably posit animals’ capability to feel pain as their core argument. Many animals have sophisticated and developed brain, which allows them to experience pain to the degree that is similar to humans’. This can be seen in the case of primates or dogs - whose screams and howls are hauntingly deafening - when being subjected to pain in scientific experiments. It is indisputably wrong to force a human being to undergo such pain, so people’s concern for the animals used in those research is readily understandable. However, completely prohibiting the use of animals in scientific research would be unwise. Regardless of how advanced medical technologies are, they cannot reconstruct or replicate animal cells to cater for certain research. Thus, to develop new medicines and treatments, animal experimentation is only unavoidable in those cases. Furthermore, people who lobby against the use of animals would probably feel differently if they themselves or their family members were cured by a medicine developed by using animals. For example, diabetes sufferers cannot live healthily without Insulin, which was developed by experimenting on dogs. In conclusion, most animals can indeed feel pain to a certain degree, so causing them to experience unnecessary suffering is unacceptable. However, I believe that the development of important medicines sanctifies the suffering caused for animals. There are still several important caveats: unnecessary experiments using animals must not be carried out if they have been done before or do not facilitate medical advancement; and scientists have to try to find ways to minimize the amount of pain animals have to go through
Animal
rights activists
often
try to ‘proselytize’
people
based on anthropomorphic
ideas
claiming that it is unethical to subject
animals
to
pain
and suffering in the name of ‘
good
’ for humankind.
However
, I
agree
with those who say that it is a necessary evil.

On the one hand,
animal
rights advocates
justifiably
posit
animals’
capability to feel
pain
as their core argument.
Many
animals
have sophisticated and developed brain, which
allows
them to experience
pain
to the degree
that is
similar to humans’. This can be
seen
in the case of primates or dogs
-
whose screams and howls are
hauntingly
deafening
-
when
being subjected
to
pain
in scientific experiments. It is
indisputably
wrong
to force a human being to undergo such
pain
,
so
people
’s concern for the
animals
used
in those research is
readily
understandable.

However
, completely prohibiting the
use
of
animals
in scientific research would be unwise. Regardless of how advanced medical technologies are, they cannot reconstruct or replicate
animal
cells to cater for certain research.
Thus
, to develop new medicines and treatments,
animal
experimentation is
only
unavoidable in those cases.
Furthermore
,
people
who lobby against the
use
of
animals
would
probably
feel
differently
if they themselves or their family members
were cured
by a medicine developed by using
animals
.
For example
, diabetes sufferers cannot
live
healthily
without Insulin, which
was developed
by experimenting on dogs.

In conclusion
, most
animals
can
indeed
feel
pain
to a certain degree,
so
causing them to experience unnecessary suffering is unacceptable.
However
, I believe that the development of
important
medicines sanctifies the suffering caused for
animals
. There are
still
several
important
caveats: unnecessary experiments using
animals
must
not
be carried
out if they have
been done
before
or do not facilitate medical advancement; and scientists
have to
try to find ways to minimize the amount of
pain
animals
have to
go
through
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Ex 18: Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
310 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts