It is frequently suggested that school children keep studying at schools rather than going to college or lyceum until they reach 18. Is this approach really justified? In this essay, I will investigate this argument and state my point of view.
On the one hand, there appear to be two main reasons for staying at school. Children are expected to assimilate knowledge more intensively and effectively at schools as they are always under supervision by co-operating their parents. This would encourage them to attend lessons constantly and lead to better academic achievements. Secondly, already adapted pupils do not want to leave their comfort zones to adventures new study place. That is to say, it takes a plethora of time to find their own place in educational environment. This can be even more challenging if children are introvert and less sociable.
On the other hand, studying at colleges and lyceums sometimes could provide better chance and benefits which schools could not. For example, providing that students are interested and want to continue further education in one sphere, they can be easily directed and taught by highly-qualified teachers. Furthermore, students with the same interests and field have a chance to feel a sense of real competition and enhance their knowledge by sharing their ideas.
Having looked at both sides, it seems that not only can schools be better place for children to study until they get 18, on the contrary colleges can also be strong alternatives as long as school-leavers have potential and viable ambitions. 
It is  
frequently
 suggested that  
school
  children
  keep
 studying at  
schools
  rather
 than going to college or lyceum until they reach 18. Is this approach  
really
 justified? In this essay, I will investigate this argument and state my point of view.
On the one hand, there appear to be two main reasons for staying at  
school
.  
Children
 are  
expected
 to assimilate knowledge more  
intensively
 and  
effectively
 at  
schools
 as they are always under supervision by co-operating their parents. This would encourage them to attend lessons  
constantly
 and lead to better academic achievements.  
Secondly
, already adapted pupils do not want to  
leave
 their comfort zones to adventures new study place.  
That is
 to say, it takes a plethora of time to find their  
own
 place in educational environment. This can be even more challenging if  
children
 are introvert and less sociable. 
On the other hand
, studying at colleges and lyceums  
sometimes
 could provide better chance and benefits which  
schools
 could not.  
For example
, providing that students  
are interested
 and want to continue  
further
 education in one sphere, they can be  
easily
 directed and taught by  
highly
-qualified teachers.  
Furthermore
, students with the same interests and field have a chance to feel a sense of real competition and enhance their knowledge by sharing their  
ideas
.
Having looked at both sides, it seems that not  
only
 can  
schools
 be better place for  
children
 to study until they  
get
 18,  
on the contrary
 colleges can  
also
 be strong alternatives as long as school-leavers have potential and viable ambitions.