While some people argue that creative activities like drawing or painting should be taught at school, others insist that they are useless and should not be part of the curriculum. Both views will be discussed in this essay before arriving at a conclusion.
There are several merits to teaching drawing or painting at school. To start with, they foster the creativity of children. The very act of holding a pencil and making shapes on paper improve the motor skills and hand-eye coordination of children. This is the main reason why most schools teach drawing to primary students. Another advantage of including these lessons is that they help children to discover their inherent talents for painting or drawing. Those who have a flair of drawing can then join a drawing school to hone their skills.
The main argument against making these lessons a part of the curriculum is that they waste the time of children who have no aptitude for drawing. Some parents are also disappointed that these classes rarely teach anything beyond the basics.
While these arguments might sound logical, the truth is that drawing benefits everyone. Of course, not all children who learn drawing at school will become an eminent artist when they grow up. However, this is hardly a reason to remove drawing classes from the curriculum. Even if a child does not become a professional painter in the future, she will still benefit from the improved motor coordination skills she acquired through drawing.
In conclusion, the argument that drawing lessons are useless does not hold water for the simple reason that the act of drawing improves the cognitive and intellectual skills of all children including those who have no talent for drawing.
While
some
people
argue that creative activities like
drawing
or painting should
be taught
at
school
, others insist that they are useless and should not be part of the curriculum. Both views will
be discussed
in this essay
before
arriving at a conclusion.
There are several merits to teaching
drawing
or painting at
school
. To
start
with, they foster the creativity of
children
. The
very
act of holding a pencil and making shapes on paper
improve
the motor
skills
and hand-eye coordination of
children
. This is the main reason why most
schools
teach
drawing
to primary students. Another advantage of including these lessons is that they
help
children
to discover their inherent talents for painting or
drawing
. Those
who
have a flair of
drawing
can then
join
a
drawing
school
to hone their
skills
.
The main argument against making these lessons a part of the curriculum is that they waste the time of
children
who
have no aptitude for
drawing
.
Some
parents are
also
disappointed that these classes rarely teach anything beyond the basics.
While these arguments might sound logical, the truth is that
drawing
benefits everyone.
Of course
, not all
children
who
learn
drawing
at
school
will become an eminent artist when they grow up.
However
, this is hardly a reason to remove
drawing
classes from the curriculum. Even if a child does not become a professional painter in the future, she will
still
benefit from the
improved
motor coordination
skills
she acquired through drawing.
In conclusion
, the argument that
drawing
lessons are useless does not hold water for the simple reason that the act of
drawing
improves
the cognitive and intellectual
skills
of all
children
including those
who
have no talent for
drawing
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes