Two thousand years ago, Aristotle proposed six elements of drama, which included plot, characters, thought, diction, melody and spectacle. His comprehensive evaluation played a very preponderant role in the golden age of theatre and also stood the test of the time. From my perspective, a smash hit directed by Bong Joon-Ho in 2019 is one of a few Korean movies achieving these rigorous standards. This essay will appraise "Parasite" based on three Aristotlian most predominant criteria in this day and age: message, characters and spectacle.
To commence with, "Parasite" is positively evaluated by both critics and audiences on an alluring storyline. This movie vividly illustrates the symbiotic relationship between the wealthy Park and the destitute Kim clan by dramatic twists and grand climax. "Parasite" is structured in three phrases: the intrusion of parasites, the confrontation of segregated parasites and the extermination along with regeneration of parasites. There is neither superfluity nor paucity of symbolism in the movie, from a torrential rain to a nasty smell, which makes every detail thought-provoking. For example, the ubiquitous images of Native American forewarn that the rich Park are excluded from their own home likewise these Indians.
Furthermore, realistic protagonists with distinct stages of psychological development are portrayed in "Parasite". Despite sharing the same classes, genders or ages, no one is peripheral. Their actions stem from detailed plans, primitive instinct and emotional explosion which is the result of long term constraint. Metaphors in "Parasite" reflect a rotten society in which even the rich are parasites and a parasite can be the host of others. To elaborate, the director interprets a plain fact: not only the poor Kim, but also the housewife depends on her affluent husband. In addition, that the previous maid relying solely on the homeowner hides her husband on the ground floor of that house for years comes as a complete surprise.
This para is more about telling the movie plot, not evaluate “character building with psychological dev”
Last but not least, the topical theme is an enormous contribution to the international success of “Parasite”. Albeit not the first movie about the wealth gap, what makes it a masterpiece is the concentration on subtle changes in well-off people’s attitudes. Moreover, “Parasite” fully describes how self-esteem conflicts with narcissism in poverty-stricken people’s minds. The movie manifests contemporary Korean society, but most countries are beset with this acute problem. In other words, it yields fascinating insights into human relationships and conveys vital messages. => this para is more focused and better
In conclusion, “Parasite” is regarded as one of the most rewarding movies as it complies with storyline, protagonists and theme. It is envisaged that the Korean film-making industry will launch more qualified products such as “Parasite”.
Two thousand years ago, Aristotle proposed six elements of drama, which included plot, characters,
thought
, diction, melody and spectacle. His comprehensive evaluation played a
very
preponderant role in the golden age of
theatre
and
also
stood the
test
of the time. From my perspective, a smash hit directed by Bong
Joon-Ho
in 2019 is one of a few Korean
movies
achieving these rigorous standards. This essay will appraise
"
Parasite
"
based on three
Aristotlian
most predominant criteria in this day and age: message, characters and spectacle.
To commence with,
"
Parasite
"
is
positively
evaluated by both critics and audiences on an alluring storyline. This
movie
vividly
illustrates the symbiotic relationship between the wealthy Park and the destitute Kim clan by dramatic twists and grand climax.
"
Parasite
"
is structured
in three phrases: the intrusion of parasites, the confrontation of segregated parasites and the extermination along with regeneration of parasites. There is neither superfluity nor paucity of symbolism in the
movie
, from a torrential rain to a nasty smell, which
makes
every detail
thought
-provoking.
For example
, the ubiquitous images of Native American forewarn that the rich Park
are excluded
from their
own
home
likewise
these Indians.
Furthermore
, realistic protagonists with distinct stages of psychological development
are portrayed
in
"
Parasite
"
. Despite sharing the same classes, genders or ages, no one is peripheral. Their actions stem from detailed plans, primitive instinct and emotional explosion which is the result of long term constraint. Metaphors in
"
Parasite
"
reflect a rotten society in which even the rich are parasites and a parasite can be the host of others. To elaborate, the director interprets a plain fact: not
only
the poor Kim,
but
also
the housewife depends on her affluent husband.
In addition
, that the previous maid relying
solely
on the homeowner
hides
her husband on the
ground floor
of that
house
for years
comes
as a complete surprise.
This para is more about telling the
movie
plot, not evaluate “character building with psychological dev”
Last
but
not least, the topical theme is an enormous contribution to the international success of “Parasite”. Albeit not the
first
movie
about the wealth gap, what
makes
it a masterpiece is the concentration on subtle
changes
in well-off
people
’s attitudes.
Moreover
, “Parasite”
fully
describes
how self-esteem conflicts with narcissism in poverty-stricken
people
’s minds. The
movie
manifests contemporary Korean society,
but
most countries are beset with this acute problem.
In other words
, it yields fascinating insights into human relationships and conveys vital messages.
=>
this para is more focused and better
In conclusion
, “Parasite”
is regarded
as one of the most rewarding
movies
as it complies with storyline, protagonists and theme. It
is envisaged
that the Korean film-making industry will launch more qualified products such as “Parasite”.