Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Essay topics: TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? -Interrupt and correct the mistake v.2

Essay topics: TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? -Interrupt and correct the mistake v. 2
Under the circumstances described in the issue, I would definitely prefer to talk the leader after the end of the meeting because this approach has no glaring disadvantages but has serious advantages over other proposed options. The reasons on which my prospect is based will be discussed in details below. Firstly, my opinion about a mistake may be incorrect and in order not to be ashamed I would prefer to wait till the end of the meeting and then discuss my viewpoint on the issue with the speaker. There are several possibilities, for instance, I might misunderstand speaker' s words, I may have a wrong opinion which is based on obsolete information or, of course, the leader may be mistaken as well. Due to those options it is reasonable and wise to take a time and discuss the supposed mistake without people. Secondly, the second option is better because it will not inevitably lead to spoiling relationships with the speaker or undermining his authority. By discussing the problem without witnesses the position of the leader will not be compromised. By contrast, interrupting the speaker in the middle of the meeting in front of the public who ought to obey his rule will definitely subvert the leader' s authority and it may lead to a change in the leader' s attitude to the person who corrected him. It is needless to say that this is undesirable outcome for the person who works under the leader because of conspicuous reasons. Finally, keep silence is not a good option either because the leader may be unaware about the mistake but in some cases saying nothing may lead to grave and dire consequences for the speaker and even for the success of the company. For instance, we all heart about debacle of Samsung’s Note 7 smartphone, it is believed that one of the reason of the commercial disaster is stiff hierarchical structure of Korean society when employees are terrified to openly talk up to the boss and saying nothing about the mistake in the design led to the millions of dollars in losses. At the same time, having a conversation about the mistake may have easily annihilated the possible negative outcome for the corporation. Thus it is not only an option but a duty to talk to a responsible person about a noticed mistake. Due to aforementioned ground, approaching of a meeting leader after the meeting is the most attractive, beneficial and reasonable option among ones which were stated in the issue.
Under the circumstances
described
in the issue, I would definitely prefer to talk the
leader
after the
end
of the
meeting
because
this approach has no glaring disadvantages
but
has serious advantages over other proposed
options
. The reasons on which my prospect
is based
will
be discussed
in
details
below.

Firstly
, my opinion about a
mistake
may be incorrect and in order not to
be ashamed
I would prefer to wait till the
end
of the
meeting
and then discuss my viewpoint on the issue with the speaker. There are several possibilities,
for instance
, I might misunderstand
speaker&
#039; s words, I may have a
wrong
opinion which
is based
on obsolete information or,
of course
, the
leader
may
be mistaken
as well
. Due to those
options
it is reasonable and wise to take a time and discuss the supposed
mistake
without
people
.

Secondly
, the second
option
is better
because
it will not
inevitably
lead to spoiling relationships with the speaker or undermining his authority. By discussing the problem without witnesses the position of the
leader
will not
be compromised
. By contrast, interrupting the speaker in the middle of the
meeting
in front of the public who ought to obey his
rule
will definitely subvert the
leader&
#039; s authority and it may lead to a
change
in the
leader&
#039; s attitude to the person who corrected him. It is needless to say that this is undesirable outcome for the person who works under the
leader
because
of conspicuous reasons.

Finally
,
keep
silence is not a
good
option
either
because
the
leader
may be unaware about the
mistake
but
in
some
cases saying nothing may lead to grave and dire consequences for the speaker and even for the success of the
company
.
For instance
, we all heart about debacle of Samsung’s Note 7 smartphone, it
is believed
that one of the reason of the commercial disaster is stiff hierarchical structure of Korean society when employees
are terrified
to
openly
talk up to the boss and saying nothing about the
mistake
in the design led to the millions of dollars in losses. At the same time, having a conversation about the
mistake
may have
easily
annihilated the possible
negative
outcome for the corporation.
Thus
it is not
only
an
option
but
a duty to talk to a responsible person about a noticed mistake.

Due to aforementioned ground, approaching of a
meeting
leader
after the
meeting
is the most attractive, beneficial and reasonable
option
among ones which
were stated
in the issue.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
24Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes
A special kind of beauty exists which is born in language, of language, and for language.
Gaston Bachelard

IELTS essay Essay topics: TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? -Interrupt and correct the mistake v. 2

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
418 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts