Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals because individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1

Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals because individuals can do too little. v. 1
In the last decade, there has been an ongoing argument that politicians should take responsibility for the protection of the environment, since individuals are powerless to make a change. Although political figures should place a premium on environmental protection, individuals are to jointly share this burden. There are a number of reasons to believe that politicians play a crucial role in mitigating pollution. First, since environmental degradation is caused by heavy industrialisation, only the government has sufficient authority to hold these factories accountable. For example, by imposing environmental taxes on industries which are consuming a great deal of fossil fuel, the state can curb their carbon emission and force them to use renewable energy. Second, only the government can organise and finance, environmental movements at a large scale, which proves to be much more impactful than an individual’s effort. In fact, since no single citizen can attract enough funds as well as support for a significant change without political aid, their endeavour may be in vain. Nevertheless, individuals are set to shoulder the burden of environmental protection in tandem with politicians. First, since they are the building blocks of society, the common citizens are the driving force needed for every transformation. In fact, any environmental movement, regardless of its scale, requires the support of the public, which means that individual involvement is imperative for every significant victory in the war on pollution. Second, individuals are the most vulnerable before environmental degradation, which implies that they should be in pole position to combat it. This means that pollution puts peoples' lives in jeopardy, inducing them to make a stand and protect the environment in which their well. In conclusion, although political initiatives are of paramount importance to environmental protection, public support is not to be overlooked. Politicians and individuals should join forces for the betterment of the environment.
In the last decade, there has been an ongoing argument that
politicians
should take responsibility for the
protection
of the environment, since
individuals
are powerless to
make
a
change
. Although political figures should place a premium on
environmental
protection
,
individuals
are to
jointly
share this burden.

There are a number of reasons to believe that
politicians
play a crucial role in mitigating pollution.
First
, since
environmental
degradation
is caused
by heavy
industrialisation
,
only
the
government
has sufficient authority to hold these factories accountable.
For example
, by imposing
environmental
taxes on industries which are consuming a great deal of fossil fuel, the state can curb their carbon emission and force them to
use
renewable energy. Second,
only
the
government
can
organise
and finance,
environmental
movements at a large scale, which proves to be much more impactful than an
individual’s
effort. In fact, since no single citizen can attract
enough
funds
as well
as support for a significant
change
without political aid, their
endeavour
may be in vain.

Nevertheless
,
individuals
are set
to shoulder the burden of
environmental
protection
in tandem with
politicians
.
First
, since they are the building blocks of society, the common citizens are the driving force needed for every transformation. In fact, any
environmental
movement, regardless of its scale, requires the support of the public, which means that
individual
involvement is imperative for every significant victory in the war on pollution. Second,
individuals
are the most vulnerable
before
environmental
degradation, which implies that they should be in pole position to combat it. This means that pollution puts peoples'
lives
in jeopardy, inducing them to
make
a stand and protect the environment in which their well.

In conclusion
, although political initiatives are of paramount importance to
environmental
protection
, public support is not to
be overlooked
.
Politicians
and
individuals
should
join
forces for the betterment of the environment.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes
Language is to the mind more than light is to the eye.
William Gibson

IELTS essay Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals because individuals can do too little. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
307 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts